Euphemism in Indonesian Online Political Media Discourse: Referents, Social Status, and Communicative Functions

Annisa Mulia Refma, Teguh Setiawan, Anwar Efendi

Abstract


This study investigates the use of euphemisms in online political news, focusing on three main aspects: (1) the types of referents used, (2) the relationship between the social status of the reported actors and the euphemistic references, and (3) the communicative functions of euphemisms in political discourse. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the data were drawn from political news published between 1–31 January 2025 in four Indonesian online media outlets: Tirto.id, Tempo, CNN Indonesia, and Detik.com. The data were collected through reading and note-taking, coded, and analyzed based on referents, social status, and communicative functions, with validity ensured through data and theoretical triangulation. The findings show that euphemisms most frequently refer to activities (50%) and conditions (37.2%), indicating their role in softening actions and framing political situations. The social status of the actors influences referent selection: state officials often appear with euphemisms that mitigate criticism of actions and policies, politicians use euphemisms related to political maneuvering, and ordinary citizens are framed through euphemisms invoking social sympathy. Overall, euphemisms function primarily to attenuate negative meanings, shape public perception, and construct positive images of political actors and institutions.


Keywords


Euphemism; Communicative Functions; Online Media; Political Discourse; Social Status

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford University Press.

Aytan, A., Aynur, B., Hilal. P., Aytac. E., & Malahat, A. (2021). Euphemisms and dysphemisms as language means implementing rhetorical strategies in political discourse. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 741-754. 10.52462/jlls.52

Bas, O., & Grabe, M. E. (2015). Emotion-provoking personalization of news: Informing citizens and closing the knowledge gap?. Communication Research, 42(2), 159-185. 10.1177/0093650213514602

Budiyanto, D. (2014). Aspek persuasif dalam bahasa iklan partai politik. LITERA, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v13i1.1902

Chovanec, J. (2019). Euphemisms and non-proximal manipulation of discourse space: The case of blue-on-blue. Lingua, 225, 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.04.001

Ciptadi, & Armando, A. (2018). Upaya agensi melawan logika jangka pendek jurnalisme daring: Studi kasus Tirto.id. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 7(1). 10.7454/jki.v7i1.9690

Crespo-fernández, E. (2014). Euphemisms and political discourse in the British regional press. Brno studies in English, 40(1), 5-26. 10.5817/BSE2014-1-1

Creswell, J. (2016). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Pustaka Pelajar.

Denzin, & Lincoln. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Graeber, D. (2013). On the phenomenon of bullshit jobs: A work rant. Strike Magazine, 3(1), 5.

Jaganegara, H., & Wijana, I D. P. (2023). Euphemism roles as a disguise tool in political texts: A case study of Tempo online political articles. SULUK: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 5(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.15642/suluk.2023.5.1.1-19

Jayanti, R. R., Maulida, N., & Musdolifah, A. (2019). Eufemisme dan disfemisme pada judul berita surat kabar harian Balikpapan Pos periode April-Mei 2018. Jurnal Basataka (JBT), 2(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.36277/basataka.v2i1.61

Karimova, G., & Boltayeva, D. (2024). Political image building through euphemisms: Strategies in English political communication. Proceedings of the International Conference on Philology, Methodology, Translation Studies: Current Issues of Modern Science (pp. 175–177). https://doi.org/10.2024/h8twat57

Kurniawati, H. (2011). Eufemisme dan disfemisme dalam Spiegel Online. Litera, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v10i1.1172

Laila, K. (2024). Multiplatform media development is the right strategy for IDN TIMES' online media business in the era of digital technology. Digicommtive: Jurnal of Communication Creative Studies, and Digital Culture, 2(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.61771/hxycdt65

Mironina, A. Y., & Porchesku, G. V. (2023). Euphemism as a linguistic strategy of evasion in political media discourse. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 9 (2). 10.18413/2313-8912-2023-9-2-0-1

Mubaligh, A. (2010). Relasi bahasa dan ideologi. Lingua: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v5i2.622

Nazarenko, O., & Kozel, Y. (2024). Euphemisms in Mass Media Discourse: The USA Elections 2024. Advanced Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.20535/.2024.14.315711

Oktarianda, A. (2024). Polemik Terhadap Masyarakat Tentang Keberadaan Staf Khusus Presiden Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen, Hukum dan Sosial, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.30596/jmhs.v2i2.77

Raseukiy, S. (2022). Selayang Kritik atas Keberadaan Staff Khusus Milenial Presiden Jokowi. Padjadjaran Law Review, 10(1), 124-141.

Ridwan, Y., Murni, S. M., & Santoso, D. (2020). Euphemism of Political News in Republika Online Mass Media. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan Pascasarjana, 17(1), 91-101. http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/17114/

Ristiyani, Rokhman F., Rustono, Pristiwati R. (2023). A meaning of dysphemistic and euphemistic spoken by Indonesian politicians. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(7s), 451–463. https://jrtdd.com/index.php/journal/article/view/810

Rohmatullah, M. A., & Degaf, A. (2025). Framing conflict through euphemism and dysphemism in Southeast Asian and Middle Eastern media. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 10(1), 218-246. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v10i1.38200

Rosita, F. Y. (2020). Politik wacana pada berita pilpres 2019 di media daring Vivanews.com. Jurnal Komunikasi, 14(2), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol14.iss2.art4

Rovino, D., Afifah, F. N., & Wardani, T. A. A. K. (2022). Fear rhetoric in the online news discourse on the Covid-19 pandemic in Teun van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis. Journal of English Language and Culture, 11(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/jelc.v11i2.2650

Sariah. (2017). Manipulasi realitas melalui eufemisme bahasa dalam berita politik Koran Tempo. Metalingua, 15(1), 67-102. 10.26499/metalingua.v15i1.157

Sharma, P. K., & Albarakati, M. (2019). Euphemism and hegemony: Discursive power of communication across cultures. English Linguistics Research, 8(1), 55.

Singh, A. (2021). Assessing media euphemism during COVID-19 in India. International Journal of Innovations in TESOL and Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 45–53.

Sofyan, N. (2014). Bahasa sebagai simbolisasi mempertahankan kekuasaan. INTERAKSI: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 3(1), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.14710/interaksi.3.1.75-84

Sugiono, S. (2020). Fenomena Industri Buzzer di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Ekonomi Politik Media. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(1), 47-66.

Sultanovich, S. (2024). The role of euphemisms in political speech: A cognitive and rhetorical analysis. Herald Scientific E-Journal, 13, 339-342. 10.54613/ku.v13i.1093

Supriyadi, S., & Zulaeha, I. (2017). Dimensi ekonomi, politik, dan ideologi pada artikel-artikel di media massa cetak jawa pos dalam perspektif analisis wacana kritis. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(1), 1-14. 10.15294/seloka.v6i1.14747

Sydoruk, H. I., & Samoilenko, Y. I. (2022). Functional and pragmatic role of euphemisms and dysphemisms in English political discourse and the media. Scientific journal «International Journal of Philology», 13(4 ч. 2). https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog13(4_2).2022.006

Tayler, M., & Ogden, J. (2005). Doctors’ use of euphemisms and their impact on patients’ beliefs about health: an experimental study of heart failure. Patient education and counseling, 57(3), 321-326. 10.1016/j.pec.2004.09.001

Wibowo, H. H., Rizalqi, D. F., & Yani, S. H. (2021). Pengaruh revisi undang-undang kpk dalam kegiatan pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal sosial dan sains, 1(8), 943-950.

Wijana, I D. P., & Rohmadi, M. (2017). Semantik teori dan analisis. Yuma Pustaka.

Yulika, C. (2021). Discourse analysis of Van Dijk on online news text of Reynhard Sinaga case on CNN Indonesia News. International Journal of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 4(1), 28-34. 10.55637/ijsfl.4.1.4105.28-34

Zhao, L. (2014). A study on metaphor and its differences between English and Chinese cultures. Canadian Social Science, 10(4), 101-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/

Zulfahmi, M., & Agustanti, R. D. (2024). Cacat mekanisme pelaksanaan revisi UU KPK 2019 dan perbandingan substansi serta dampak terhadap kinerja KPK. Perahu (Penerangan Hukum): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(1).

Zulham, Z., Lubis, A. F., Priyono, D., Fauzan, F., Julina, S., & Deryansyah, A. D. (2024). Analisis framing media dalam berita kontroversial: Studi kasus pada kasus-kasus politik atau sosial. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 7(3), 9118-9126. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v7i3.30952




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v13i3.7358

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.