Enhancing Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding Through Technology Integration: A Systematic Literature Review

Rani Rizka Ramdani, Kana Hidayati

Abstract


This systematic review analyzes the role of technology integration in improving the conceptual understanding of pre-service mathematics teachers based on the latest literature (2016–2025). Current research remains limited in addressing how technology is integrated into pre-service teacher training, with the majority of previous studies focusing instead on technology use among students. This study aims to explore the types of technology utilized in pre-service teacher education and to analyze their influence on the development of pre-service teachers’ conceptual understanding. The implementation method followed the PRISMA guidelines with a systematic search in six databases (Scopus, ERIC, ProQuest, Emerald, Taylor & Francis, Springer), resulting in 17 articles that met the inclusion criteria after going through a rigorous selection. The results of the study reveal two key mechanisms: (1) Dynamic visualization and representation (through dynamic geometry software such as GeoGebra) that transforms abstract concepts into concrete, facilitating the understanding of mathematical principles and the relationships between concepts; (2) Interactive learning (Web 2.0-based) that encourages independent exploration, collaboration, and the development of critical thinking. Successful implementation depends on structured guidance within the framework of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). The study's conclusions confirm that the integration of technology significantly strengthens the conceptual competence of pre-service teachers as the foundation of effective teaching practices while addressing the gap in previous training models.


Keywords


Conceptual Understanding; Technology in Education; Pre-Service Teacher

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aidoo, B., Vesterinen, V.-M., Macdonald, M. A., Gísladóttir, B., & Pétursdóttir, S. (2022). Perceptions of Ghanaian Student Teachers on Benefits and Challenges of the Flipped Classroom: A Case Study. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(4), ep377. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12163

Awawdeh Shahbari, J. (2025). Features of Digital Tools Utilized in Mathematical Modeling Process. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(2), 415–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10472-4

Aytekin, C., & Kiymaz, Y. (2019). Teaching Linear Algebra Supported by GeoGebra Visualization Environment. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 12(2), 75–96.

Aytekin, C., Kiymaz, Y., & Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Education, the Department of Mathematics Education, Kırşehir, Turkey, kiymaz.yasemin@gmail.com. (2019). Teaching Linear Algebra Supported by GeoGebra Visualization Environment. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 12(2), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.12.2.7

Bani Irshid, M. M., Khasawneh, A. A., & Al-Barakat, A. A. (2023). The effect of conceptual understanding principles-based training program on enhancement of pedagogical knowledge of mathematics teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(6), em2277. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13215

Bescherer, C., & Spannagel, C. (2009). Design Patterns for the Use of Technology in Introductory Mathematics Tutorials. In A. Tatnall & A. Jones (Eds.), Education and Technology for a Better World (Vol. 302, pp. 427–435). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03115-1_45

Bicer, A. (2021). Multiple representations and mathematical creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100960

Bos, B. (2009). Technology with Cognitive and Mathematical Fidelity: What it Means for the Math Classroom. Computers in the Schools, 26(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560902906088

Bullock, E. P., Webster, J. S., & Jones, D. L. (2021). Helpful and Hindering Features of GeoGebra: Understanding What Affords Conceptual Understandings of Definite Integrals among Pre-Service Middle Grades Mathematics Teachers. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 28(2), 81–92.

Butcher, K. R. (2024). Promoting understanding in digital contexts: Using the construction-integration model as a framework for educational technology design and assessment. Discourse Processes, 61(6–7), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2024.2357983

Chen, I., & McPheeters, D. (Eds.). (2012). Cases on Educational Technology Integration in Urban Schools: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-492-5

Dinç, E., & Kim, C. (2025). Visual programming as an instrument for prospective teachers’ reasoning in geometric pattern generalization. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13618-1

Eshetu, D., Atnafu, M., & Woldemichael, M. (2022). The effectiveness of guided inquiry-based technology integration on pre-service mathematics teachers understanding of plane geometry. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202215241

Geiger, V. (2014). The Role of Social Aspects of Teaching and Learning in Transforming Mathematical Activity: Tools, Tasks, Individuals and Learning Communities. In S. Rezat, M. Hattermann, & A. Peter-Koop (Eds.), Transformation—A Fundamental Idea of Mathematics Education (pp. 203–222). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3489-4_11

Greeno, J. G. (1978). Understanding and procedural knowledge in mathematics instruction 1. Educational Psychologist, 12(3), 262–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461527809529180

Guven, B., & Cabakcor, B. O. (2013). Factors influencing mathematical problem-solving achievement of seventh grade Turkish students. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.003

Hollenstein, L., & Brühwiler, C. (2024). The importance of teachers’ pedagogical-psychological teaching knowledge for successful teaching and learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 56(4), 480–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2024.2328042

Imam, A., & Singh, G. P. (2015). Influence of Gender, Parental Education and Parental Occupation on Mathematics Achievement of Secondary School Students. Volume : 4(Issue : 11), 187–190.

Kilic, H. (2018). Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ Noticing Skills and Scaffolding Practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9784-0

König, J., Blömeke, S., Jentsch, A., Schlesinger, L., Née Nehls, C. F., Musekamp, F., & Kaiser, G. (2021). The links between pedagogical competence, instructional quality, and mathematics achievement in the lower secondary classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10021-0

Kul, U., Aksu, Z., & Birisci, S. (2019). The Relationship between Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Web 2.0 Self-Efficacy Beliefs. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2019.01.014

Kutluca, T. (2017). Views of Mathematics Teacher Candidates about the Technological Tools That Can Be Used in Mathematics Lessons. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 321–330.

Lee, K.-H., Kim, Y., & Lim, W. (2021). Risks of aiming to kill two birds with one stone: The affect of mathematically gifted and talented students in the dual realities of special schooling. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(4), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1784696

Milinković, J. (2024). Visualization as a tool in teaching: Pre-service teachers’ competencies in visualization. In B. Doig, J. Novotná, B. Kaur, & D. Pugalee (Eds.), Elementary Mathematics Teaching (1st ed., pp. 177–198). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192869647.003.0011

Minadja, A. W. S., Sutiarso, S., & Firdaus, R. (2024). The Effectiveness of Using Electronic Student Worksheet With A Contextual Approach On Student Adversity Quotient. Mathline : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v9i3.655

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Ncube, M., & Luneta, K. (2025). Concept-based instruction: Improving learner performance in mathematics through conceptual understanding. Pythagoras, 46(1), a815. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v46i1.815

Patkin, D., & Plaksin, O. (2019). Procedural and relational understanding of pre-service mathematics teachers regarding spatial perception of angles in pyramids. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2018.1480808

Ragab, K., Fernandez-Ahumada, E., & Martínez-Jiménez, E. (2024). Engaging Minds—Unlocking Potential with Interactive Technology in Enhancing Students’ Engagement in STEM Education. In A. ElSayary & R. Olowoselu (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches for Educators’ and Learners’ Well-being (pp. 53–66). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65215-8_5

Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346

Ruqoyyah, S., Murni, S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2020). The Effect of VBA for Microsoft Excel as Teaching Material to Improve Prospective Elementary School Teachers’ Mathematical Conceptual Understanding. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 7(2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v7i2.26494

Schuetz, R. L., Biancarosa, G., & Goode, J. (2018). Is Technology the Answer? Investigating Students’ Engagement in Math. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(4), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1490937

Skulmowski, A. (2023). Shape distinctness and segmentation benefit learning from realistic visualizations, while dimensionality and perspective play a minor role. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100015

Suparatulatorn, R., Jun-on, N., Hong, Y.-Y., Intaros, P., & Suwannaut, S. (2023). Exploring problem-solving through the intervention of technology and Realistic Mathematics Education in the Calculus content course. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp103-128

Syahidah, A. K., & Miatun, A. (2024). The Effect Of The Use Of Online Geogebra Learning Media And Learning Style Categories On The Mathematical Communication Skills Of Junior High School Students. Mathline : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4), 1201–1217. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v9i4.712

Tatar, E., & Zengin, Y. (2016). Conceptual Understanding of Definite Integral with GeoGebra. Computers in the Schools, 33(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1177480

Twissell, A. (2014). Visualisation in applied learning contexts: A review. Educational Technology and Society, 17(3), 180–191.

Uygun, T., Sendur, A., Dere, R., & Ozcakir, B. (2023a). Development of TPACK with Web 2.0 Tools: Design-Based Study. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 445–465.

Uygun, T., Sendur, A., Dere, R., & Ozcakir, B. (2023b). Development of TPACK with Web 2.0 tools: Design-based study. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12907

Villarreal, M. E., Esteley, C. B., & Smith, S. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ experiences within modelling scenarios enriched by digital technologies. ZDM, 50(1–2), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0925-5

Wilkie, K. J. (2011). Academic continuity through online collaboration: Mathematics teachers support the learning of pupils with chronic illness during school absence. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820903545542

Zambak, V. S., & Tyminski, A. M. (2017). A Case Study on Specialised Content Knowledge Development with Dynamic Geometry Software: The Analysis of Influential Factors and Technology Beliefs of Three Pre-Service Middle Grades Mathematics Teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(1), 82–106.

Zambak, V. S., & Tyminski, A. M. (2020). Examining mathematical technological knowledge of pre-service middle grades teachers withGeometer’s Sketchpadin a geometry course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2019.1650302

Zambak, V. S., & Tyminski, A. M. (2023). Connections Between Prospective Middle-Grades Mathematics Teachers’ Technology-Enhanced Specialized Content Knowledge and Beliefs. RMLE Online, 46(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2022.2151681

Zulu, M. W., & Mudaly, V. (2023). Unveiling problem-solving strategies of pre-service mathematics teachers: A visual and discursive exploration. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2299. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13344




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v12i11.7122

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.