Formulation of Social Sanctions for Corruption Convicts as a Form of Finding New Legal Rules in Indonesia
Abstract
Corruption is an extraordinary crime that has a very complex modus operando with the involvement of more than one party. Corruption has become a culture in government life in Indonesia. Therefore, effective law enforcement is needed to be able to eradicate this crime. So far in Indonesia, criminal sanctions have been implemented as a form of legal accountability, but in fact this is not enough to deter corruptors. The aim of this research is to formulate new legal findings in the form of implementing social sanctions as a form of law enforcement in corruption cases. The research method used is normative research. The results of the research show that social sanctions are felt to be effective because the focus is on causing psychological burdens, namely in the form of shame because they are required to become social workers for a certain period of time. It is hoped that this feeling of shame will trigger a sense of deterrence so that corruptors do not repeat the same actions. However, unfortunately until now there are no laws and regulations that stipulate social sanctions as an alternative sanction for criminal acts of corruption. Therefore, from this research, it is hoped that the government can immediately formulate social sanctions as additional sanctions to assess their effectiveness in eradicating criminal acts of corruption.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aerlang, M., Reginasari, A., & Annisa, V. (2016). Pakar Rupia (Apa Kerja Keras Koruptor Indonesia?): Membangun Sanksi Psikososial Bagi Terpidana Kasus Korupsi. Jurnal Integritas, 2(1), 175–191.
Atmoko, D., & Syauket, A. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau dari Perspektif Dampak Serta Upaya Pemberantasan. Binamulia Hukum, 11(2), 177–191.
Buamona, S. S. (2022). Penerapan Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Analisis Ekonomi. Al Mizan: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ekonomi, 8(2), 155–165.
Hannan, A., & Syarif, Z. (2023). TINJAUAN SOSIOLOGI HUKUM TERHADAP PENGATURAN SANKSI SOSIAL BAGI PELAKU KORUPSI DI INDONESIA KONTEMPORER. Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 14(2), 177–201.
Harkrisnowo, H. (2002). Korupsi, Konspirasi, dan Keadilan di Indonesia. Jurnal DictumLeIP Edisi I Lentera Hati, 67.
Hartono, & Sugi, M. (2016). Korupsi Kebijakan oleh Pejabat Publik. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 2(2).
Indria, L. N., & Muhammad, A. (2022). Efektivitas Hukuman Pidana Penjara sebagai Efek Jera terhadap Pelaku Korupsi di Indonesia. JUSTUTIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 9(3), 1445–1450.
Muttaqi, N. I. N. (2023). Rekonstruksi Konsep Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Penjara dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Lex Renaissance, 2(8), 269–289.
Raumin, L. O., Bouto, L. O. M., & Yusuf, B. (2018). BENTUK-BENTUK SANKSI SOSIAL MASYARAKAT TERHADAP PERILAKU MENYIMPANG REMAJA (Studi Di Desa Mabodo Kecamatan Kontunaga Kabupaten Muna). Jurnal Neo Societal, 3(1), 315–324.
Soekanto, S. (2005). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Rajawali Press.
Sulisttyawaty, S. (2019). Strategi Pencegahan Korupsi dengan Budaya Malu (Studi Komparatif Masyarakat Melayu dengan Jepang). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora, 4(1), 442.
Tansar, A., Manurung, M., & Siregar, S. A. (2022). Kajian Kriminologi Penerapan Sanksi Pemberian Rasa Malu (Shaming) Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Retentum, 3(1), 201–212.
Wijaya, T. H. D., & Umara, N. S. (2022). PENERAPAN SANKSI SOSIAL SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KEJAHATAN SIBER (CYBER CRIME). Al-Qisth Law Review, 5(2), 371–404.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v12i2.6630
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.