Grammaticalization of Marine Animals as a Living Environment: A Case Study in Eco-Linguistics of the Bima Language
Abstract
This study analyzes the grammaticalization process in naming marine animals in Bima language, especially the use of prefixes {ka-}, {sa-}, and marine animals that do not have prefixes Ø the use of these prefixes reflects the physical characteristics and ecological relationships between Bima people and their marine environment. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection methods in the form of interviews, observation, and documentation. The data obtained was then analyzed with an ecolinguistic approach to understand how language represents human relationships with nature, as well as grammaticalization theory to reveal structured linguistic patterns in naming marine animals. The results show that the {ka-} prefix is consistently used for 'hard-shelled animals', while the {sa-} prefix is used to symbolize 'soft-shelled/non-shelled marine animals'. This study confirms that the grammaticalization process in Bima language not only explains the physical characteristics of marine animals, but also the relationship between Bima people and their marine ecosystem. In addition, this study also reveals that marine animals that are not grammaticalized reflect their position outside the human environment, but are still an important part of fulfilling their needs.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.
Baharudin, R., Jalaluddin, N. H., & Ho-Abdullah, I. (2013). Sumbangan framenet kepada leksikografi korpus: Kajian kes penyelisikan makna kata kerja melihat. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 13(1), 61.
________. (1949). Budaya, bahasa dan kepribadian . Univ. California Press.
Bybee, J. (2003). Fonologi dan penggunaan bahasa (Vol. 94). Cambridge University Press.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge University Press.
Curtis, D., Lehmann, R., & Zamore, PD (1995). Pengaturan translasi dalam perkembangan. Cell , 81 (2), 171-178.
Dewi, F. I., Suntini, S., & Hanifah, I. (2024). Leksikon Flora dan Fauna dalam Kumpulan Cerita Rakyat Kabupaten Kuningan: Kajian Ekolinguistik. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya, 10(3), 599-608.
Edward, William. (1956). Grammaticalization as a Concept in Linguistic Theory. Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 21-30.
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429-492.
Fill, A., & Mühlhäusler,P.(2001). The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology, and environment. Continuum.
Haugen, E. (1972). “The Ecology of Language”. dalam Dil, A.S. (ed) The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
Henn-Memmesheimer, D. (2004). Grammaticalization: A paradigm for the study of language change. In Language change and linguistic theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Henn-Memmesheimer, D. (2006). Grammaticalization and language evolution. In Language evolution: The states of the art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Hymes, D. (1964). Introduction: toward ethnographies of communication 1. American anthropologist, 66(6_PART2), 1-34.
Jaafar, M. F., & Jaludin, A. (2022). Analisis Wacana Persekitaran dari Perspektif Ekolinguistik. Jurnal Linguistik, 26(2), 001-009.
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. (2006). Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge University Press.
Lucy, J. A. (1992). Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mbete, A. M. (2007). Ecolinguistics is a discipline that studies the environment and language.
Mbete, A. M. (2008). Ekolinguistik: Perspektif kelinguistikan yang prospektif. Bahan Matrikulasi Program Magister dan Doktor Linguistik Program Pascasarjana Universitas Udayana
Mukhibun, A., Hanifah, D. N. R., Sumarwati, S., & Andayani, A. (2024). Representasi Disfemisme pada Pemberitaan Isu Lingkungan di Media Massa Nasional: Studi Ekolinguistik. Jurnal KIBASP (Kajian Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran), 7(2), 550-566.
Ndruru, M. (2020). Leksikon Flora Pada Bolanafo Bagi Guyub Tutur Nias Kajian Ekolinguistik. Jurnal Education and Development, 8(2), 257-257.
Nurdiyanto, E., Resticka, G. A., & Yanti, S. N. H. (2022). Ekoleksikon burung merpati sebagai suplemen pembelajaran bahasa berbasis lingkungan: perspektif ekolinguistik. SEMIOTIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Sastra Dan Linguistik, 23(1), 1-13.
Pradita, L. E., & Jendriadi, J. (2024). Metafora Bahasa Lokal Magelang dalam Perspektif Ekolinguistik. Journal of Education Research, 5(1), 466-478.
Renjaan, M. R. (2014). Leksikon bahasa kei dalam lingkungan kelautan: Kajian ekolinguistik (Doctoral dissertation, Udayana University).
Ridwan, A. (2016). Gramatikalisasi Verba Haben Dan Sein. Jurnal Paramasastra, 3(1).
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Sapir, E. (1929). Status linguistik sebagai ilmu. Bahasa , 207-214.
Subiyanto, Agus. (2013). Ekolinguistik: Model Analisis dan Penerapannya Humanika, vol. 18, no. 2, Jul. 2013. https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.18.2.
Sugiyono. 2020. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan
R&D. Jakarta : PT. Ikrar Mandiri.
Syamsiah, S. (2024). Leksikon Peralatan Dapur Tradisional Desa Sambori Kecamatan Lambitu: Sebuah Kajian Ekolinguistik (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas_Muhammadiyah_Mataram).
Traugott, E. (2003). Dari Subjektifikasi ke Intersubjektifikasi . Motif Perubahan Bahasa/Cambridge University Press.
Trudgill, P. (1983). On dialect: Social and geographical perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Utami, N. M. V., Jayantini, I. G. A. S. R., Ariyaningsih, N. N. D., & Hikmaharyanti, P. D. A. (2023, July). Leksikon Fauna Upakara Dalam Ritual Hindu Di Bali: Kajian Ekolinguistik. In Prosding Seminar Nasional Linguistik dan Sastra (pp. 108-118).
Wardaugh, Ronald. 1998. An introduction to Sosiolinguistics. Oxford: Basil Blaekwell Ltd.
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Yusra, K. (2017) Language, Thought And Social Awareness: a Preliminary Anthropological Linguistic Investigation Of Time And Space in The Bima Language. Antropologi Indonesia, 53-67.
______. (2012). Language and solidarity. Mataram: Cerdas.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v12i1.6501
Refbacks
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.