International Legal Framework for Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights
Abstract
Traditional knowledge held by indigenous and local communities has important cultural and ecological value. International legal frameworks have been developed to protect and manage this knowledge in a fair and sustainable manner. Legal instruments such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Nagoya Protocol regulate access to genetic resources and promote the equitable sharing of benefits among communities holding traditional knowledge. However, implementation at the national level is faced with challenges such as harmonization with complex national laws and limited resources. Case studies demonstrate the various strategies used by countries to improve legal protection, including strengthening national legal frameworks and active participation of indigenous communities in decision-making. With joint efforts, it is hoped that this legal framework will ensure that traditional knowledge is well preserved for future generations, while providing equitable benefits to the communities that own it.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
AFNAN, S. N. (2020). Perlindungan terhadap Pengetahuan Tradisional asal Indonesia Ditinjau dari Aspek Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Penelitian Jamu Tradisional di Yogyakarta (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Birkbeck, C. D. (2016). The world intellectual property organization (WIPO): A reference guide. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Busche, J., Stoll, P. T., & Arend, K. (Eds.). (2008). WTO-trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights (Vol. 7). Brill.
Bustani, S. (2018). Perlindungan Hak Komunal Masyarakat Adat Dalam Perspektif Kekayaan Intelektual Tradisional Di Era Globalisasi: Kenyataan Dan Harapan. Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS, 6(3), 304-325.
Chandra, A., & Idrisova, A. (2011). Convention on Biological Diversity: a review of national challenges and opportunities for implementation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20, 3295-3316.
Correa, C. (2020). Trade related aspects of intellectual property rights: a commentary on the TRIPS agreement. Oxford University Press.
Correa, C. M., & Yusuf, A. A. (Eds.). (2016). Intellectual property and international trade: The TRIPS agreement: The TRIPS agreement. Kluwer Law International BV.
Dinwoodie, G. B., & Dreyfuss, R. C. (2009). Designing a Global Intellectual Property System Responsive to Change: The WTO, WIPO, and Beyond. Hous. L. Rev., 46, 1187.
Fitriani, N., & Sulistiyono, A. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal terhadap Obat Tradisional Jamu sebagai Pengetahuan Tradisional. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(3), 253-279.
Hakim, L., & Negara, P. D. (2018). Perlindungan Pengetahuan Tradisional (Traditional Knowledge) Dalam Dimensi HAM: Upaya Harmonisasi Hukum Dalam Kerangka Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia. In Proceeding Conference on Innovation and Application of Science and Technology (CIASTECH), September (pp. 318-327).
Halbert, D. J. (2006). The World Intellectual Property Organization: Past, Present and Future. J. Copyright Soc'y USA, 54, 253.
Ilyasa, R. M. A. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Atas Pengetahuan Tradisional Indonesia Terhadap Praktek Biopiracy Dalam Rezim Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Gema Keadilan, 7(3), 170-194.
Morgera, E., & Tsioumani, E. (2010). Yesterday, today, and tomorrow: Looking afresh at the Convention on Biological Diversity. Yearbook of International environmental law, 21(1), 3-40.
Morgera, E., Tsioumani, E., & Buck, M. (2014). Unraveling the nagoya protocol: a commentary on the nagoya protocol on access and benefit-sharing to the convention on biological diversity (p. 444). Brill.
Nizwana, Y. (2022). Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal dalam Perspektif Teori Hak Milik. JUDAKUM: Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum, 1(2), 86-101.
Nugroho, T. A. (2024). POLITIK HUKUM KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL KOMUNAL DALAM SISTEM HUKUM NASIONAL. Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti, 57-66.
Raharja, I. F., & Kusniati, R. ANALISIS MODEL PENGATURAN HUKUM HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL PENGETAHUAN TRADISIONAL MASYARAKAT ADAT Oleh.
Rongiyati, S. (2016). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Atas Pengetahuan Tradisional. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, 2(2), 213-238.
Sofyarto, K. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual atas Pengetahuan Tradisional terhadap Perolehan Manfaat Ekonomi. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(1), 149-162.
Susanti, D. I. (2022). Eksplorasi Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal Berbasis Hak Asasi Manusia. Media Iuris, 5(3).
Susanti, D. I., Sudhiarsa, R. I., & Susrijani, R. (2019). Ekspresi budaya tradisional dan hak kekayaan intelektual. Percetakan Dioma Malang.
Tobing, C. I., & Hutagalung, J. M. (2023). Kepentingan Indonesia Terhadap Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional dalam Sumber Hukum Internasional Mengenai Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Krtha Bhayangkara, 17(1), 127-140.
Yulia, M., & Zainol, Z. A. (2013). Melindungi Keanekaragaman Hayati dalam Kerangka Protokol Nagoya. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 25(2), 271-283.
YULIA, N. (2023). PERLINDUNGAN KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL KOMUNAL MASYARAKAT TRADISIONAL DALAM SISTEM HUKUM NASIONAL (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Andalas).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i10.5917
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.