Harmonization of Authority in the Investigation of the Financial Services Sector in Indonesia

Muhammad Ridho Ramadhenta, Fx Joko Priyono

Abstract


The rapid growth of the financial services sector in Indonesia demonstrates its strategic role in the national economy. However, harmonizing investigative authorities in this sector poses a challenge that needs to be addressed to maintain stability and public trust. This paper aims to investigate the issue of harmonizing investigative authorities in the Indonesian financial services sector, focusing on regulatory frameworks, case developments, and potential harmonization models. The evolution of investigative authority regulations in the financial services sector is outlined, identifying weaknesses in the system that need to be addressed. Case studies provide a concrete overview of the challenges faced in field investigations. A harmonization model for investigative authorities is proposed as a solution to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of investigations. Under this harmonization model, OJK investigators are not the sole authority to conduct investigations in the financial services sector, but their authority must be elaborated with that of the POLRI or PPNS investigators as regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). Article 49 paragraph (5) of Law No. 4 of 2023 concerning Financial Services Sector (P2SK Law), which essentially states that criminal investigations in the financial services sector can only be conducted by OJK investigators through a harmonization model of investigative authority in the financial services sector in Indonesia, should be elaborated so that investigative authority in the financial services sector can be carried out by POLRI or PPNS with the assistance of OJK investigators.

Keywords


Harmonization; Authority; Investigation; Financial Services Sector.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulkadir, M. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Citra Aditya Bhakti.

Amirudin, Z. A. (2012). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Andang Setyobudi. (2007). Peran serta Bank Indonesia dalam Pengembangan Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM). Buletin Hukum Perbankan Dan Kebanksentralan, 5(2), 21–42.

Dewa Putu Christian, Praditya Ardhianto, U. H. W. (2016). Bank Bumn Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 77/Puu-Ix/2011 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 49 Prp Tahun 1960 Tentang Panitia Urusan Piutang Negara. Privat Law, 4(1), 1–11.

Gratia Debora Mumu. (2016). Kewenangan Jaksa Sebagai Penyidik Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Administratum, 4(3), 37–46.

H.A Malthuf Siroj, I. M. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Progresif: Upaya Mewujudkan Keadilan Substantif. Hakam: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam, 1(2), 237–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33650/jhi.v1i2.76

Herdian Ayu Andreana Beru Tarigan, D. H. P. (2019). Protection of Customers For Management of Digital Banking Services (Study at PT. BRI Unit Boyolali). Hang Tuah Law Journal, 2(2), 170–179. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v3i2.128

Irma, R. T. (2019). Pengelolaan Dokumen Elektronik Layanan Jasa Keuangan Berbasis Financial Technology (Fintech). AKSY: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Syariah, 1(1), 13–22.

Johannes Suhardjana. (2010). Supremasi Konstitusi Adalah Tujuan Negara. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 10(3), 257–269. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2010.10.3.96

M. Aris Purnomo, E. S. (2015). Rekonseptualisasi Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Polri Dalam Rangka Efektifitas Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Law Reform, 11(2), 230–240.

Maria Lysa Yunita. (2020). Analisis Kerjasama Perbankan Dengan Fintech: Kasus di Bank BRI Jakarta Sudirman. Universitas Gajah Mada.

Mayasari, N. E. (2019). Peranan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengguna Financial Technology (Fintech). Universitas Diponegoro.

Nisa Amalina Adlina. (2023). Kewenangan Penyidikan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Di Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Al’ Adl : Jurnal Hukum, 15(2), 250–269.

Nun Harrieti. (2016). Kewenangan Bank Indonesia dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Pasca Berlakunya POJK Nomor 1/POJK. 07/2013 dan POJK Nomor 1/POJK. 07/2014 terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Nasabah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE’JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 1(2), 329–343.

Rustian Kamaluddin. (1983). Beberapa Aspek Pembangunan Nasional dan Daerah. Ghalia Indonesia.

Santi, Ernama, Budiharto Budiharto, and H. S. (2017). Pengawasan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Financial Technology (Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/Pojk. 01/2016). Diponegoro Law Journal, 6(3), 1–24.

Suharini, R. H. (2020). Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Fintech Ilegal Di Indonesia Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Pada Konsumen. Jurnal AKRAB JUARA, 5(3), 25–38.

Sukanto, S. (2008). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Utiarahman, A. P. (2020). Upaya Paksa Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 8(10), 24–33.

Yustianti, S. (2017). Kewenangan Pengaturan Dan Pengawasan Perbankan Oleh Bank Indonesia Dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK),. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 1(1), 60–72.

Zainal Asikin. (2020). Hukum Perbankan dan Lembaga Pembiayaan Non Bank (2nd ed.). Raja Grafindo Persada.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i5.5678

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.