Case Study of Politeness Strategies in Speech Therapy for Clients with Language Disorders: A Psycholinguistic Analysis
Abstract
This paper explores the application of politeness strategies by Speech Therapists in the context of interventions with clients experiencing Language Disorders. Language, serving as a tool for self-expression and social adaptation, becomes crucial in the process of socialization. However, individuals with Language Disorders face challenges in communication, impacting their ability to participate in society. Speech Therapists play a vital role in addressing these challenges through comprehensive interventions, employing various language strategies and methods tailored to individual client needs. The study employs qualitative research methods, focusing on speech acts and politeness strategies used by Speech Therapists during therapy sessions. Data collection involves observation and note-taking techniques, with primary data consisting of speech acts performed by therapists and secondary data providing additional information about therapists and clients. Qualitative data analysis is conducted concurrently with data collection, involving data reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal effective combinations of verbal and non-verbal speech acts, along with politeness strategies, facilitating positive responses from clients. The study emphasizes the importance of directive speech acts, both verbal and non-verbal, in conveying therapeutic messages. The politeness strategies, particularly the use of positive and negative politeness, contribute to minimizing client burdens and maintaining engagement. Additionally, the study identifies challenges faced by therapists in situations of client non-responsiveness, emphasizing the need for adaptability in therapeutic approaches. In conclusion, the research sheds light on the dynamics of communication in speech therapy for clients with Language Disorders. Effective combinations of speech acts and politeness strategies enrich the therapeutic process, fostering client engagement. However, challenges underscore the importance of therapists' responsiveness and creativity in tailoring interventions to individual client needs. The study contributes valuable insights to the field of Speech Therapy and highlights avenues for further research in optimizing language interventions for individuals with communication disorders.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (5th Ed). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
Balthazar, C. H., Ebbels, S., & Zwitserlood, R. (2020). Explicit grammatical intervention for developmental language disorder: Three approaches. Language, Speech, and Hearing.
Chaer, Abdul. (2007). Psikolinguistik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Djajasudarma, T. F. (2012). Wacana dan Pragmatik. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama
Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ibrahim, Abd. Syukur. (1993). Kajian Tindak Tutur. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Kissine, M., Cano-Chervel, J., Carlier, S., De Brabanter, P., Ducenne, L., Pairon, M. C., ... & Leybaert, J. (2015). Children with autism understand indirect speech acts: Evidence from a semi-structured act-out task. PLoS One, 10(11), e0142191.
Law J, Dennis JA, Charlton JJV. Speech and language therapy interventions for primary speech and/or language disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD012490. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012490.
Leech, G. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Mahsun. (2012). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Lexy J. Moleong (penulis). (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif / penulis, Prof. DR. Lexy J. Moleong, M.A. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya,.
Owens Jr, R. E. (2016). Language Development: An Introduction| Edition: 9. New Jersey: Pearson.
Parsons L, Cordier R, Munro N, Joosten A, Speyer R. A systematic review of pragmatic language interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. PLoS One. (2017) Apr 20;12(4):e0172242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172242. PMID: 28426832; PMCID: PMC5398499.
Rahardi, Kunjana. (2005). Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Rhoad‐Drogalis, A., Justice, L. M., Sawyer, B. E., & O'Connell, A. A. (2018). Teacher–child relationships and classroom‐learning behaviours of children with developmental language disorders. International journal of language & communication disorders, 53(2), 324-338.
Simanjuntak, Mangantar. (1987). Pengantar Psikolinguistik Moden. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Wijana, I Dewa Putu dan Muhammad Rohmadi. (2011). Analisis Wacana Pragmatik Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.
Santosa, R. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Kebahasaan. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif cetakan ketiga. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tarigan, H.G. (2015). Berbicara Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i1.5387
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.