Differences Effect of Direct and Indirect Learning Methods on Increasing Triple Jump Capability in Male Students of Xi Students of Sma Negeri I Polokarto Sukoharjo
Abstract
This study aims to determine: 1) The difference between the effect of direct and indirect learning methods to an increase in male's triple jump at the class XI student of SMA Negeri I Polokarto Sukoharjo; 2) Learning that has a better effect between direct and indirect learning on the increase in triple jumps in male students of class XI student of SMA Negeri 1 Polokarto Sukoharjo. The research method used is the experimental method, the namely experimental activity which begins with giving treatment to the subject which ends with a form of test to determine the effect of the treatment that has been given. The sampling technique used is random sampling. The population in this study were male students of class XI of SMA Negeri 1 Polokarto Sukoharjo in the 2017/ 2018 academic year, totaling 71 students and then drawn with a random sampling technique to obtain 30 samples. Data analysis techniques were carried out by normality and homogeneity tests, to fulfill the assumptions about the results of the study conducted a different test. Based on the results of the study obtained the following conclusions: 1) There is a significant difference between the direct and indirect learning approaches to the ability of triple jump in male students of class XI of SMA Negeri 1 Polokarto Sukoharjo in academic year 2011/ 2012, with a calculated value tcount is 2,229 and ttable is 2.145 with a significance level of 5%; 2) Triple jump learning with the indirect learning approach has a better effect than the direct learning approach to the ability of triple jump in male students of class XI of SMA Negeri 1 Polokarto Sukoharjo in the academic year 2017/2018. Group 1 (direct learning) has an increase of 2.491%. While group 2 (indirect learning) has an increasing percentage of 6.820%.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adang Suherman, Yudha M. Saputra,Yudha Hendrayana, 2001. Pembelajaran Atletik Pendekatan Permainan dan Kompetisi. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Aip Syarifudin .1992. Atletik. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Dirjen Dikti Proyek Pembinaan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Magill, Richard A.. 1995. Motor Learning Concepts and Applications. Louisiana State University:Wm.C.Brown Communications, Inc.
Nana Sudjana. 2000. Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Samsudin, 2009. Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga dan Kesehatan Sekolah Dasar/ MI. Jakarta.
Sugiyanto 1998. Perkembangan dan Belajar Motorik. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
________ 1995. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Sukintaka. 2004. Teori Pendidikan Jasmani. Filosofi Pembelajaran dan Masa Depan. Yogyakarta.
Rusli Lutan. 1988. Belajar Keterampilan Motorik, Pengantar Teori dan Metode. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Rusli Lutan & Adang Suherman. 2000. Perencanaan Pembelajaran Penjaskes. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Wina Sanjaya. 2010. Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Harald Muller dan Wolfgang Ritzdorf, ____. Lari, Lompat, Lembar Level I. dialih-bahasakan oleh Suyono Danusyogo. Staf Sekretariat IAAF-RDC: Jakarta.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i6.515
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.