The Influence of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use on Technostress in Court Registrars at Religious Courts
Abstract
Technological developments are increasing rapidly in various sectors to support work activities. The application of new technology in the organization will affect the entire organization, especially in human resources. Religious courts as a public service entity in the field of justice must follow social needs in the midst of advances in information technology. The purpose of this research is to analyze the effect of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the application of information systems to technostress to the Registrar of the Session at the Religious Court. This research is a quantitative study, with a sample of 75 respondents in the Religious Courts of Lombok Island. Data analysis technique uses Structural Equation Model-Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) with the help of SmartPLS.3.0. The results showed that perceived usefulness has a negative and significant effect on technostress, whereas perceived ease of use has no effect on technostress to court clerks at the Religious Courts of Lombok Island.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., and Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological Antecedents and Implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858.
Bilbao-Osorio, B., Dutta, S., and Lanvin, B. (2013). The Global Information Technology Report 2013: Growth and Jobs in a Hyperconnected World. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Borle, P., Reichel, K., Niebuhr, F., & Voelter-Mahlknecht, S. (2021). How Are Techno-Stressors Associated with Mental Health and Work Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Information and Communication Technologies within the Technostress Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8673. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168673
Brod, C. (1984). Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Chandra, S., Shirish, A., & Srivastava, S. C. (2020). Theorizing technological spatial intrusion for ICT enabled employee innovation: The mediating role of perceived usefulness. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120320
Chin, W. W. (1998), The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295-336.
Davis, F.D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Davis, F. D. (1989), Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Effiyanti, Tri., Siswandari., Heri Sawiji. (2013). Pengaruh Computer Anxiety dan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) terhadap Technostress pada Guru SMK di Kabupaten Karanganyar. Thesis, Magister Pendidikan Ekonomi Program Pascasarjana UNS.
Ekawarna, H. (2018). Manajemen konflik dan stres (B. S. Fatmawati, Ed.). Bumi Aksara.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 466–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.466
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research.
Fuglseth, A. M., & Sørebø, Ø. (2014). The effects of technostress within the context of employee use of ICT. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.040
Gaudioso, F., Turel, O., and Galimberti, C. (2017). The mediating roles of strain facets and coping strategies in translating techno-stressors into adverse job outcomes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 69, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.041
Ghozali, Imam. (2006). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS (Edisi Ke 4). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Edisi 8. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gopher, D., & Donchin, E. (1986). Workload: An examination of the concept. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol. 2. Cognitive processes and performance, 1–49. John Wiley & Sons.
Hartono, Arif., Ana Wahyu Wulandari. (2018). Pengaruh Computer Anxiety danTechnology Acceptance Model (TAM) terhadap Technostress pada Karyawan Koperasi di Kabupaten Ponorogo. Seminar Nasional dan Call For Papers III Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, 34 – 57.
Hart, S.G. and Staveland, L.E. (1988), Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Peter A. Hancock and Najmedin Meshkati (ed.), Advances in Psychology, Human Mental Workload. North-Holland, 139–183.
Haryono, Siswoyo. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling : Untuk Penelitian Manajemen Menggunakan AMOS 18.00. Intermedia Personalia Utama.
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P. and Cavaye, A.L. (1997). Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model. MIS Quarterly, 21, 279-305.
Jogiyanto. (2008). Analisis dan Desain Sistem Informasi : Pendekatan Terstruktur Teori dan Praktek Aplikasi Bisnis. ANDI.
Kim, Dae Geun, and Chang Won Lee. (2021). Exploring the Roles of Self-Efficacy and Technical Support in the Relationship between Techno-Stress and Counter- Productivity. Sustainability, 13(8), 4349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084349
Kirch, Wilhelm. (2008), Encyclopedia of Public Health. Springer.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1986). Cognitive Theories of Stress and the Issue of Circularity. In M. H. Appley, & R. Trumbull (Eds.), Dynamics of Stress. Physiological, Psychologcal, and Social Perspectives (pp. 63-80). New York: Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5122-1_4
Lee, J. Y. and Panteli, N. (2010). Business Strategic Conflict in Computer-mediated Communication. European Journal of Information Systems, 19( 2), 196-208.
Le Fevre, M., Matheny, J., & Kolt, G. S. (2003). Eustress, distress, and interpretation in occupational stress. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(7), 726–744. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940310502412
Lewis, William, Ritu Agarwal dan V Sambamurthy. (2003). Source of Influence on Beliefs About Information Technology Use, An Empirical Study of Knowledge Worker. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 316-328.
Mahkamah Agung. (2020). Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2020. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
Maier, C., Laumer, S., Wirth, J., & Weitzel, T. (2019). Technostress and the hierarchical levels of personality: A two-wave study with multiple data samples. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(5), 496–522.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research, 2, 173-191.
Matt, C., Hess, T., and Benlian, A. (2015). Digital transformation strategies. Bus. Infor. Sys. Eng. 57(5). doi: 10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5
Moran, M..J. (2006). College Student’s Acceptance of Tablet Personal Computers: A Modification of The Unified Theory of Acceptance And Use of Technology Model. Dissertation unpublished, Capella University, Australia
O'Donnell, R. D., & Eggemeier, F. T. (1986), Workload assessment methodology. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, Cognitive processes and performance, 2, 1–49. John Wiley & Sons.
O’Donnell, R.D., dan Eggemeier, F.T. (1986). Workload Assessment Methodology. Wiley.
Oluwagbemi, O., Abah, J., and Achimugu, P. (2011). The Impact of Information Technology on Nigeria's Banking Industry. Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, 7(2), 63-67.
Pakarbudi, Adib. (2015). Analisis Dampak Technostress Pada Pengguna E-Learning Dengan Menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) (Studi Kasus: Share ITS Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya). Skripsi Jurusan Sistem Informasi Fakultas Teknologi Informasi, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November.
Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Mataram. (2021). Laporan Tahunan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Mataram 2021. Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Mataram.
Riggio, R. E. (2009). Introduction To Industrial/organizational Psychology (Fifth Edition). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., and Nogareda, C. (2007). El Tecnoestrés: Concepto, Medida e Intervención Psicosocial. [Technostress: Concept, Measurement and Prevention]. Madrid: Nota Técnica de Prevención. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo.
Salo, M., Pirkkalainen. H., Chua. C., and Koskelainen, Tiina. (2017). "Explaining Information Technology Users’ Ways Of Mitigating Technostress". In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal, June 5-10, 2017 (pp. 2460-2476).
Setyadi, Hario Jati. (2019). Analisis Dampak Penggunaan Teknologi (Technostress) Kepada Dosen dan Staff Karyawan Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Kinerja di Dalam Organisasi (Studi Kasus: Perguruan Tinggi di Kalimantan Timur). Informatika Mulawarman: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komputer 14(1).
Shu, Q., Tu, Q., & Wang, K. (2011). The impact of computer self-efficacy and technology dependence on computer-related technostress: A social cognitive theory perspective. Intl Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(10), 923-939.
Sholikhah, Aswi Malik. (2015). Analisis gejala technostress pada pustakawan. Jurnal Fihris, 10(2), 27-40.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Alfabeta.
Suh, A., and Lee, J. (2017). Understanding teleworkers’ technostress and its influence on job satisfaction. Internet Research, 27(1), 140-159.
Suharti, Lieli, Agung Susanto, (2014). The Impact of Workload and Technology Competence on Technostress and Performance of Employees. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications, 5(2), 01-07.
Tarafdar, Monideepa & Tu, Qiang & Nathan, Ragu & Ragu-Nathan, T.. (2007). The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity. J. of Management Information Systems. 24. 301-328. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109.
Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E., and Ragu-Nathan, T. (2014). Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103-132.
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, T., and Ragu-Nathan, B. (2011). Crossing to the darkside: Examining Creators, Outcomes, and Inhibitors of Technostress. Communications of The ACM, 54(9), 113-120.
Venkatesh, Viswanath, Fred D. Davis. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
Wijayanti, Ratih, Fitriansyah Hambali, dan Armaini Akhirson. (2011). Analisis Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Terhadap Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Penerimaan Nasabah Terhadap Layanan Internet Banking (Studi Empiris Terhadap Nasabah Bank di Depok). Proceeding PESAT (Psikologi, Ekonomi, Sastra, Arsitektur & Sipil) Universitas Gunadarma, 4, 121-127.
Yin, P., Davison, R. M., Bian, Y., Wu, Ji., & Liang, L. (2014). The sources and consequence mobile technostress in the workplace. PACIS Proceedings.
You-Kyung, Lee, (2021). Impacts of Digital Technostress and Digital Technology Self-Efficacy on Fintech Usage Intention of Chinese Gen Z Consumers. Sustainability, MDPI, 13(9), 1-1
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i7.4879
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.