The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Models of Type Peer Tutor and Two Stay Two Stray in Junior High Schools Reviewed From Students Physics Learning Activities
Abstract
The focus of this article is on the effectiveness of the cooperative learning models in Peer Tutor and Two Stay Two Stray high schools in terms of students' physics learning activities. The purpose of this study was to identify how effective the cooperative learning models were Peer Tutor and Two Stay Two Stray junior in high schools. Data obtained in journal writing comes from international and national journals, book documents, proceedings, thesis articles, and websites that relate to the object of research and then analyzed using text analysis techniques. The results showed that the cooperative learning models were Peer Tutor and Two Stay Two Stray suitable for junior high school students considering that this age was a transitional period. from concrete times to formal times. The task of being a tutor in this peer tutoring learning model is that they (the tutors) must try to get new relationships and relationships that are strong with peers, find their own role, and develop intellectual and social skills. While the learning model is Two Stay Two Stray also very easy to apply in all levels of class, especially for learning Physics in junior high because basically like a discussion group. Both learning models can be used effectively in all subjects, especially physics and for all ages, students, especially in junior high schools, so that students' physical learning activities are more optimal.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul, Majid. (2013). “Strategi Pembelajaran”. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Depdiknas. (2014). “Permendikbud No. 146 Tahun 2014”. Jakarta: Depdiknas
Hanafiah, N,. & Cucu S. (2010). “Konsep Strategi Pembelajaran”. Bandung: Refika Aditama
Huda, M. (2014). “Cooperative Learning: Metode, Teknik, Struktur, dan Model Penerapan”. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Jalil, Jasman. (2014). “Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK)”. Jakarta: Prestasi
Lie. Anita. (2010). “Cooperative Learning”. Grasindo. Jakarta
Patmawati, E. (2012). “Apa arti fisika”. Diakses 18 Agustus 2018 dari http://apaipa.blogspot.com/2012/09/apa-arti-fisika.html
Rusman, dkk. (2011). “Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan. Komunikasi : Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru”. Jakarta: Rajawali. Pers
Sambiri, U. (2012). “Hakekat Fisika dalam Pembelajaran”. Diakses 18 Agustus 2018 dari http://www.butoncerdas.blogspot.com/2012/11/05/article/do-hakekat-fisika-dalam pembelajaran.html
Sardiman. (2011). “Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar”. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo
Sastradi, T. (2012). “Hakikat Belajar Fisika”. Diakses 18 Agustus 2018 dari http://mediafunia.blogspot.com/2013/02/hakikat-belajar-fisika.html
Sugiyanto, (2009). “Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif”. Surakarta: Panitia Sertifikasi. Guru Rayon 13 FKIP UNS
Suherman, E. (2003). “Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer”. Bandung: UPI.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2007). “Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktek”. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Suryo & Amin. (1984). “Pengajaran Remidial”. Jakarta: Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar
Young, M.R. 1999. “The motivational effects of the classroom environment in facilitating self-regulated learning”. Journal- of-Marketing-Education, 27, 25-40. Diakses 18 Agustus 2018 dari http://researchgate-psu-education-view-doc/jmd.sagepub.com/content/27/1/25.short?rss=1&ssource=mfc
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i4.445
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.