Conditional Criminal Conviction in the Perspective of Eradicating Corruption

Aan Dwi Satriyo Yudho, Siti Marwiyah

Abstract


Corruption is a global problem. Currently, corruption is more understandable by various parties than eradicating it, even though corruption is one type of crime that can touch various interests related to human rights, state ideology, economy, state finances, national morals, and so on, which is evil behavior that tends to be difficult to deal with. This research is dotted with reviewing and reviewing the rules regarding conditional sentences that apply in Indonesia. In this study, researchers will use a normative type of research, namely normative research, namely legal research that puts the law as a building of a norm system. The norm system in question is about the principles, norms, rules of laws and regulations, court decisions, and doctrines. Corruption crimes regulate Criminal Threats that allow Conditional Crimes to be applied in this case. Unfortunately, application of conditional crime for corruption cases that are sentenced to probation, or imposed conditional sentences, of course, it greatly hurts the sense of justice of the community besides that criminal convictions in corruption crimes should be applied without any tolerance for Corruptors because corruption crimes are extraordinary crimes, so corruption needs to be dealt with in extraordinary ways as well.


Keywords


Corruption; Criminal Law; Conditional Sentence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Djaja, E. (2010). Memberantas Korupsi Bersama KPK. Sinar Grafika.

Hamzah, A. (2014). Korupsi di Indonesia Masalah dan Pemecahannya. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Hartanti, E. (2005). Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Sinar Grafika.

Hatta Isnaini Wahyu Utomo. (2019). The Position of Honorary Council of Notary in Coaching Indonesian Notaries. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 92. https://doi.org/10.7176/jlpg/92-12

Isnaini, H., & Utomo, W. (2019). The existence of the notary and notarial deeds within private procedural law in the industrial revolution era 4.0. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(3), 128–139.

Isnaini, H., & Wanda, H. D. (2017). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Peralihan Tanah Yang Belum Bersertifikat. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 24(3), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss3.art7

Lamintang. (1984). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Baru.

Muladi; Barda Nawawi Arief. (2005). Teori - teori dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Alumni.

Muladi. (2002). Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Alumni.

Prakoso, D. and A. I. (2017). Hak Asasi Tersangka dan Peranan Psikologi Dalam Konteks KUHAP. Bina Aksara.

Soesilo, R. (1996). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pidana. Politea.

Utomo, H. I. W. (2020). Memahami Peraturan Jabatan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah. Kencana.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i2.4449

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.