Mapping the Construct of Obedience in Education

Yuarini Wahyu Pertiwi, Erik Saut H Hutahaean, Tiara Anggita Perdini, Farida Novitasari

Abstract


Obedience in the world of education is general education and religious-based education. Parameters of obedience with the rules are seen conventionally through the absence of behavior that violates the rules. However, the extent to which students interpret the rules requires more specific measurements. Therefore, a measurement concept is needed to map how students interpret the rules. This study intends to develop a measuring instrument that can map obedience through an approach to how students interpret the rules in the universities environment. Students who come from general-based and religious-based universities are involved in getting the classification of manifestations of obedience. The correlation techniques and component analysis found that religious-based students complied with the stages of accept, belief, and act. In contrast, the general (non-religious) students complied with the stages of accept, act, and belief. Therefore, this study recommends that it is necessary to study the obedience model in order to predict obedience factors.


Keywords


Construct; Education; Obedience

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agnesta, T. (2018). Perbedaan Kepatuhan Terhadap Peraturan Asrama ditinjau dari jenis kelamin pada santri. Riset Psikologi, 2018(3).

Ariyanto, E. A., & Sa’diyah, N. H. (2018). Kepatuhan Terhadap Figur Otoritas dan Radikalisme Pada Remaja. 105(3), 129–133.

Bègue, L., Beauvois, J. L., Courbet, D., Oberlé, D., Lepage, J., & Duke, A. A. (2015). Personality Predicts Obedience in a Milgram Paradigm. Journal of Personality, 83(3), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12104

Blass, T. (1999). The milgram paradigm after 35 years: Some things we now know about obedience to authority. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 955–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00134.x

Blass, T. (2000). Obedience to Authority. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

Chasanah, N. (2021). Leadership of Kiai and Students’ Obedience in Islamic Boarding School. Resolusi, 4(1), 42.

Dewantara, J. A., Hermawan, Y., Yunus, D., Prasetiyo, W. H., Efriani, E., Arifiyanti, F., & Nurgiansah, T. H. (2021). Anti-corruption education as an effort to form students with character humanist and law-compliant. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 18(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v18i1.38432

Engelmann, S., Chen, M., Fischer, F., Chingyu, K., & Grossklags, J. (2019). Clear sanctions, vague rewards: How China’s social credit system currently defines “good” and “bad” behavior. FAT* 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287585

Febriyanti, F., & Montessori, M. (2020). Pembinaan Perilaku Sosial Antar Mahasiswa di Asrama Mahasiswa Surau Yayasan Amal Saleh. Journal of Civic Education, 3(1), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.24036/jce.v3i1.333

Kaposi, D. (2017). The resistance experiments: Morality, authority and obedience in Stanley Milgram’s account. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(4), 382–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12137

Khong, K. W. (2005). The Perceived Impact Of Successful Outsourcing On Customer Service Management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(5).

Lu, M., He, K., Huang, J. Z., & Qian, X. (2018). Principal Component Analysis for Exponential Family Data. In G. R. Naik (Ed.), Advances in Principal Component Analysis Research and Development. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6704-4

Merriam-webster. (2021). Screen Shot 2015-05-29 at 09. Www.Merriam-Webster.Com.

Milgram, S. (1963). Primary Sources Behavioral Study of Obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371-378.

Normasari, Sarbaini, & Adawiyah, R. (2012). Jurnal pendidikan kewarganegaraan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 3(5), 320–327. http://eprints.ulm.ac.id/1161/1/JURNAL PKN Vol 3 No 5 Mei 2013.pdf

Raby, R. (2012). School Rules: Obedience, Discipline, and Elusive Democracy. In Practical Professional Child Care. University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.12968/ppcc.2006.3.7.38877

Rochat, F., & Blass, T. (2014). Milgram’s unpublished obedience variation and its historical relevance. Journal of Social Issues, 70(3), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12071

Sarbaini. (2014). Good Practices-Pendidikan Nilai, Moral dan Karakter Kepatuhan (1st ed.). Aswaja Presindo Yogjakarta.

Simbolon, M. (2013). Perilaku Bullying pada Mahasiswa Berasrama. Jurnal Psikologi, 39(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.6989

Suleman, D. (2020). Disiplin: Sikap Dan Perilaku Taat. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF REFLECTION : Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 3(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v3i1.111

Suntiah, R., Fikri, M., & Assidiqi, M. H. (2020). Perbandingan Akhlak Siswa Berasrama dengan Non Asrama SMA Boarding School. Atthulab: Islamic Religion Teaching and Learning Journal, 5(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.15575/ath.v5i1.5216




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i12.4233

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.