Ulama Communication Strategy at the “Indonesia Mengaji” Event Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia in Realizing a Peaceful Indonesia

Siti Rumilah, Kisyani Laksono, Bambang Yulianto

Abstract


This study aims to find; 1) the form of the ulama's communication strategy, 2) the function of the ulama's communication strategy, and 3) the implications of the use of the communication strategy used by the ulema at the "Indonesia Mengaji" event at the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach, with recording, listening, and note-taking techniques. The recording technique is used to collect data in the field. The listening technique is carried out to verify the recorded data. While the note-taking technique was carried out to record data according to the research corpus. This research resulted; 1) Communication strategies carried out by scholars include; a) Transfer strategy, b) Paraphrasing, c) Avoidance and procrastination, d) Gesture and mimic strategy. The ulama's communication strategy serves as a form of satire, information, and persuasion. Meanwhile, the implications of the strategy carried out include: a) a comprehensive understanding for the taklim assembly, b) increasing the response for the taklim assembly, c) the minimum difference between the intentions of the ulama and the taklim assembly, and d) the message of the ulama can be well received without any conflict. 


Keywords


Communication Strategy; Ulama; Peaceful Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Austin, J.L. How to do Thing with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1962. Brown Gillian & Yule George. Discourse Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1983.

-------- Analisis Wacana; Discourse Analysis (terjemahan I. Soetikno). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. 1996.

Cangara, Hafied. 2013. Perancanaan dan Strategi Komunikasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.

Creswell, John W, 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, dan Mixed Methods Approaches. London: SAGE Publications.

Crowley dan Mitchell. Communication Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press Association. 1998.

Djadjasudarma, Fatimah T. Wacana Pemahaman dan Hubungan Antarunsur. Bandung: PT. Eresco. 1994.

Downes, William. Language and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1998.

Duranti, Aleaaandro. 2000. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eriyanto. Analisis Wacana; Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS Yogyakarta. 2001.

Grice, H.P. Logic and Conversation; In Syntax and Semantic, Vol. 3 Speech Acts. P. Cole and J.Morgan (eds) London: Academic Press. 1975. Holmes, Janet. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, London and New York: Logman. 1992.

Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and Conversation; In Syntax and Semantic, Vol. 3 Speech Acts. P. Cole and J.Morgan (eds) London: Academic Press.

Hakim, Fauzia Zahira Munirul.2018. “Fungsi Ilokusi smiling Emoji sebagai Strategi Kesantunan” (e-mail: zhrfauzia@gmail.com, diakses tanggal 23 September 2018).

Hartanti, R., & Soerjantini. 2003. “Peran Sense of Humor Pada Dampak Negatif Stres Kerja.Anima, Indonesian Psychological Journal. 18, 4: 393–408.

Hughes, L., W. 2008. A Correlational Study of the Relationship between Sense of Humor and Positive Psychological Capacities.Economics and Business Journal: Inquiries and Perspectives. Vol. 1, No. 1: 46-55.

Ibrahim, Abd. Syukur. Kajian Tindak Tutur. Usaha Nasional Surabaya: Depdikbud. 1993.

Jones, C. L. 2010. The Relationship between Health Status, Life Satisfaction, and Humor as a Coping Mechanism Among Non-institutionalized. Tesis. The Florida State University College of Education.

Keraf, Gorys. Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia. 1984.

------ Komposisi. Ende Flores: Nusa Indah. 1994.

------ Tata Bahasa Indonesia untuk SMU dan SMK. Ende Flores: Nusa Indah. 1996.

Khotimah, Khusnul. 2017. “Tingkat Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Interaksi Antarsantri di Pondok Pesantren At-Taawun Bangkaan Madura (Kajian Pragmatik)”. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, Volume 1, Nomor 2, September, p.19-27.

Kusumadinata. 2015. “Proses Inkulturasi dalam Budaya Entas-Entas, Praswala Gara dan Pujan Kapat (Sistem Sosial Lokal: Antar Etnis Kabupaten Probolinggo)”. Jurnal Komunikatio, Volume 1, Nomor 1, 17-29.

Lippman, L.G., & Dunn, M.L. 2000. Contextual connections within puns: Effects on perceived humor and memory. Journal of General Psychology, 127.

Leech. Geoffrey (penerjemah Oka). 1993. Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta University Indonesia Press. 1993.

Levinson, Stephen C. Pragmatics. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 1983.

Lubis, Hasan Hamid. Analisis Wacana Pragmatik. Bandung; Angkasa. 1993.

Maanen, John Van. 2011. Tales of the field: On Writing Ethnography: Chicago : The University Chicago Press.

Malinowski, Bronislaw. 2007. Method and Scope of Anthropological Fieldwork. Dalam Antonius C.G.M. Robben dan Jeffrey A. Sluka (Ed) Ethnographic fiedwork: An anthropological reader. Maldem: Blackwell Publisher.

Markowski,Michal Oawel. 2012. “Anthropology and Literature”. Teksty Drugie: Antrhropology in Literary Stuties, 2012 (2), 85-93.

Maratus, Ika dkk. 2016. ” Local Wisdom Reflected in The Symbols in Masjid Saka Tunggal Banyumas”. Jurnal Kebudayaan Islam. Vol.15,No.1,Mei, 165-178.

Marwan, Iwan. 2013. Rasa Humor dalam Prespektif Agama. Jurnal Alturas. Vol.XIX. Nomor 1. Juni 2013. Hal 267-277.

Mufid, Ahmad Syafi’i. 2022. “Clifford Geertz dan Paradigma Penelitian Agama di Indonesia” (Pendekatan Antropologi dalam Penelitian Agama). Jurnal Multikultural dan Multireligius Vol.X, No.#, Thn. 2013.

Noviati, N. P. 2011. Selera Humor, Dampak Secara Psikologi dan Aplikasinya di Tempat Kerja. Proceeding Seminar Nasional Psikologi 2011.Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan.

Novianti, Hasmi. 2017. “Analisis Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Iklan Perdagangan di Radio Harau FM Payakumba Periode Februari –April 2016”. Bahastra. Volume 37, Nomor 2, Edisi Oktober. 129-137.

Peterson, Elizabeth. 2018. “Introduction to the Special Issue; Linguistics and Pragmatic Aucomes of Contact with English”. Journal Pragmatics. 133 (2018). P. 105-108.

Purnama, Yolanda Priska. 2016. “Pengaruh Masuknya Budaya Asing terhadap Pelestarian Kebudayaan Tari Tradisional Wayang Topeng Malang di Malang Raya, Jawa Timur”. Jurnal Pesona, Vol.2, Nomor 1, Desember, 621.

Ramli, Yusri Mohamad. 2012. “Agama dalam Tentukur Antropologi Simbolik Clifford Geertz”. International Juurnal of Islamic Thought, Vol.1: (June). P.62-73.

Sait, La Ode Irma. 2015. “Kalimat Ilokusi dalam Novel Kemamang Karya Koen Setyawan”. Jurnal Humanika. Volume 3, Nomor 15. Desember, ISSN 1979-8296. p.1-9.

Sartini, Heddy Shri Ahimsa-Putra, Al Maki. 2016. “A Pleliminary Survey on Islamic Mysticism in Java”. Jurnal Analisis, Volume XVI, Nomor 2, Desember.1-40.

Septiana, Opta dkk. 2016. “Nilai Budaya Petunjukan Musik Terbangan pada Masyarakat Semende”. Jurnal Catarsis: Jurnal of Art Education , Volume 5, Nomor 2. p.142-149.

Taber, K.H., Redden, M., & Hurley, R.A. 2007. Functional anatomy of humor: Positive affect and chronic mental illness. The Journal of Neuorpsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 19(5).

Verulitasari, Esti dan Agus Cahyono. 2016. “Nilai Budaya dalam Pertunjukan Rapai Geleng Mencerminkan Identitas Budaya Aceh”. Catharcis: Jurnal of Ars Education 5 (1) 41-47.

Yule, George. 2014. Pragmatik. Diterjenahkan oleh Indah Fajar Wahyuni. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wijana, I Dewi Putu. 2017. “Tindak Tutur Meminta Oleh kajian Pembelajaran BIPA dari Korea: KajianPragmatik Bahasa Antara (Interlanguage Pragmatics)”. Jurnal penelitian Humaniora, Volume. 18. Nomor 1, Februari. P.27-24.

Zakiah, Kiki. 2008. “Penelitian Etnografi Komunikasi. Tipe dan Metode”. Dalam Jurnal Mediator. Vol.9. No.1. Juni 2008.

Mey, L. Jacob. 1996. Pragmatik Cambridge: Blackwell Publisher Inc. Moleong. Lexy J. 2002. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Munir, Samsul. 2009. Ilmu Dakwah. Jakarta: AMZAH.

Nababan, P. W. J. Ilmu Pragmatik; Teori dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Depdikbud. 2002.

Nasution. Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung. Tarsito. 1988. Parera, J. D. Teori Semantik; Edisi Kedua, Jakarta: Erlangga. 2004.

Pateda, Mansur. Linguistik Terapn. Flores: Nusa Indah. 1990.

Purwo, Bambang K. Pragmatik dan Pengajaran Bahasa, Menyimak Kurikulum 1994. Jogjakarta. Kanisius. 1990.

Richards, Jack, dkk. Longman Dictionary of Appliet Linguistics; Longman Group (FE) Ltd. 1985.

Samsuri. Analisis Bahasa. Jakarta: Erlangga. 1994.

Searle, John R. Speech Act; An Essay in the Philosophy of Languange. Cambridge: Cambidge University Press. 1969.

Spolsky, Bernard. Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press. 1998. Sudaryanto. 1988. Metode Linguistik ke Arah Memahami Metode Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University.

Supardo, Susilo. 1988. Bahasa dalam Konteks. Jakarta: P2LPTK Suparno. 1994. Analisis Wacana. Malang: IKIP Malang.

Suwito. 1983. Sociolinguistik; Teori dan Problema. Surakarta: Henry Offset Solo Tarigan, H.G. 1996. Pengajaran Pragmatik, Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.

------- 1986a. Pengajaran Semantik. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.

------- 1987. Pengajaran Wacana. Bandung: Angkasa.

Widjaja, A.W. 2000. Ilmu Komunikasi Pengantar Studi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. New York: Oxford Universitas.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i11.4134

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.