Juridical Study on the Corporate Criminal Liabilities for Money Laundering Criminal Action with the Defendant Labora Sitorus (A Study on the Decision on Appeal Number: 1081 K/Pid.Sus/2014)

Lintang Jendro Rahmadita, Supanto Supanto, Widodo Tresno Novianto

Abstract


Corporate Crime nowadays is not only committed by people who are in the organization structure but also by people who are not listed in the organization. Based on the Decree no.1081K/PID. SUS/2014, Supreme Court provides an interpretation on the corporate director outside the organization’ structure. Supreme court subjected punishment against LS since he was considered as the corporate controller, although he is not listed on the organizational structure. The problem with LS as the personnel of Corporate manager although he was not listed on the organization structure is by the evidence that all money from the selling and shipping transaction of illegal oil fuel comes in LS’ bank account, and in fact, all the decision making of the corporation is authorized by LS. Whereas, by right, LS did not act as the manager of the corporation. This fact showed that the directing mind and will of that corporation is LS. The management of the corporation such as the boards of the directors are only the “puppets” to commit LS’ criminal act.         

Keywords: Punishment, Money Laundering, Corporation


Keywords


Punishment; Money Laundering; Corporation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alim, H. et al. 2013. Pemidanaan korporasi atas tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pusat Kajian Antikorupsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Andika, A. 2012. Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi pada tindak pidana pencucian uang. Tesis. Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Indonesia.

Eddyono, S.W. 2017. Dari ‘lacak kayu bulatnya’ ke ‘lacak uangnya’. Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform.

Ganarsih, Y. 2016. Penegakan hukum anti pencucian uang dan permasalahannya di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Handoko, D. 2015. Hukum positif mengenai hak kekayaan intelektual di Indonesia (Jilid II). Jakarta: Hawa & Ahwa.

Hiariej, E.O.S. 2014. Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Manthovani, R. 2013. Penuntutan korporasi sebagai pelaku tindak pidana dalam kejahatan di sektor kehutanan: Optimalisasi penggunaan Undang-Undang Pencucian Uang dalam pembuktian tindak pidana di sektor kehutanan di Indonesia yang dilakukan oleh korporasi. Diakses dari http://www.antikorupsi.org

Panggabean, H.P. 2014. Penerapan teori hukum Dalam sistem peradilan Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.

Amalia, R. 2016, Desember. Pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang menurut hukum Islam. Jurnal Al Jinayah, 2 (2), 388-407.

Heryndra, M.F. 2014, Juni. Kajian yuridis kriteria tentang “personel pengendali korporasi” terkait pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi berdasarkan Pasal 6 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum. Diakses dari http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id

Sabatini, H. 2010, Desember. Implementasi Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU) di Indonesia (Suatu gambaran tentang pengetahuan dana aplikasi aparat penyidik penuntut umum dan PPATK). Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 6(III), 216-231.

Sudirman, L., & Feronica. (2011, Juni). Pembuktian pertanggungjawaban pidana lingkungan & korupsi korporasi di Indonesia & Singapura. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 23 (2), 237-429.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i3.408

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.