Pre-Trial as a Legal Protection for Suspects in Tax Crimes

Agung Satryo Wibowo, Made Warka, Hufron Hufron, Sri Setyadji

Abstract


Based on Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (hereinafter abbreviated as the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia) it is stated that: "The State of Indonesia is a state of law". This means that the Republic of Indonesia is a democratic legal state based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, upholds human rights and guarantees that all citizens have the same position in law and government with no exceptions. Furthermore, Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that: "Everyone has the right to recognition, guarantees, protection and fair legal certainty and equal treatment before the law". Bearing in mind that for the sake of examining cases, it is necessary to reduce the suspect's human rights, but how should always be based on the provisions stipulated in the law, in the interest of supervision of the protection of the rights of the suspect/defendant an institution called Pre trial. Meanwhile, in tax crimes, in addition to using the Criminal Procedure Code as a general guideline, it also has its own formal criminal law rules contained in Law no. 6 of 1983 concerning General Provisions and Tax Procedures, which has been amended several times, most recently by Law no. 7 of 2021 (hereinafter abbreviated as UU KUP).


Keywords


Human Rights; Pre Trial; Tax Crimes

Full Text:

XML

References


Atmasasmita, Romli. 2011. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

HS, Salim. 2012. Perkembangan Teori Dalam Ilmu Hukum. Yogyakarta: Rajawali Press.

Hufron. 1999. “Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah Dan Penerapannya.” Cakrawala Hukum 2.

ICJR. n.d. “Mekanisme Praperadilan Harus Di Reformasi Total, Perma 4 Tahun 2016 Belum Kompherensif Mengatur Soal Praperadilan.” Icjr. Retrieved February 29, 2020 (https://icjr.or.id/mekanisme-praperadilan-harus-di-reformasi-total-perma-4-tahun-2016-belum-komprehensif-mengatur-soal-praperadilan).

M.Hadjon, Philipus. 1993. Tentang Wewenang. Surabaya.

Manan, Bagir. 1992. Dasar-Dasar Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Jakarta: Ind Hill Co.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2009. Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.

Nahak, Simon. 2014. “Hukum Pidana Perpajakan.” P. 78 in Hukum Pidana Perpajakan. malang: Setara Press.

Poerwadarminta, W. J. S. 1976. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Suratman, and Philips Dillah. 2015. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 65/PUU- IX/2011;

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 21/PUU-XII/2014;

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 102/PUU-XIII/2015;




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i9.4057

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.