Social Exchange in Broiler Breeding using Core-Plasma Partnership System

Indah Wulandari, Mahendra Wijaya, Ahmad Zuber

Abstract


This article will discuss the form of social exchange in broiler breeding using core-plasma partnership system. This study was a case study taken place in Blitar Regency as one of broiler cattle breeding centers in Indonesia. The result of research showed that cattle raisers followed core-plasma partnership system because it was considered as having smaller risk than independent system. The core-plasma partnership began with social exchange between cattle raisers and Partner Company. Profit-loss, mutual need, and trust consideration underlies the exchange occurring in core-plasma partnership. Cattle raisers with limited business capital could run broiler breeding with Partner Company’s help as integrator that provided day old chicken (DOC), feed, and drugs, and marketed the harvest product. Meanwhile, Partner Company with limited land and workers could also benefit from the partnership ran. The exchange was considered as fair when it generated profit for each other despite difference profit obtained by the parties. The end of partnership implied that there was no longer social exchange between the parties engaged.


Keywords


Social Exchange; Broiler Breeding; Core-Plasma Partnership

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Chicago : John Wiley & Sons

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design : Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar

Damsar & Indrayani. (2015). Pengantar Sosiologi Ekonomi. Jakarta : Prenadamedia

Dinas Peternakan. (2015). Lakip (Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah). Dinas Peternakan Kabupaten Blitar

Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan. (2017). Statistik Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan, Kementerian Pertanian RI

Fletcher K. L .(1987). The Law Of Patnership. Sidney: The Law Book Company Limited

Hafsah, M. J. (1999). Kemitraan Usaha. Jakarta : Pustaka Sinar Harapan

Hartono, A. H. (1997). Beternak Ayam Pedaging Super. Pekalongan : Gunung Mas

Homans, G. C. (1974). Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms. Rev Edition. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. New York

Majid, R. & Hasan, S. (2014). Performance of Broiler Contract Farmers : A Case Study In Perak, Malaysia. UMK Procedia 1 :18-25

Nurtini, S dkk. (2017). Performance of Broiler Farmer In Patnerships System At Surakarta, Indonesia. Journal Of Advanced Agricultural Technologies, Vol 4 (2) : 196-199

Poloma, M. (1987). Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jakarta : Rajawali Press

Purnomo, S. H & Ratriyanto, A. (2012). Manajemen Agribisnis Ayam Broiler di Indonesia. Surakarta : UNS Press

Slamet, Y. (2006). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Surakarta: UNS Press

Sunyoto, D. (2012). Majanemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta : CAPS

Wibosono, Y. (2007). Membedah Konsep dan Aplikasi CSR. Gresik : Fascho Publishing

Yin, R. K. (2013). Studi Kasus : Desain dan Metode. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada

Zeitlin, I. (1995). Memahami Kembali Sosiologi. Yogyakarta : UGM Press




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i3.400

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.