The Effectiveness of Online Examination During the Covid-19 Pandemic on Law Enforcement in Subdit II of Dittipidum of Bareskrim Polri (Case Study on Decision Number: 935/PID.B/2020/PN BDG)

Beste Refo Kandida, Suya Nita, Mulyadi Mulyadi

Abstract


The objectives of the present study were 1) to find and analyze obstacles when conducting online examination of witnesses and suspects, 2) to analyze and offer efforts so that the results of online examination of witnesses and suspects can become evidence that has binding power throughout the criminal justice process. This was qualitative study that combines normative and empirical study. The study was conducted at the Sub-Direktorat II of Dittipidum of Bareskrim Polri. The analysis was based on the applicable laws and regulations and was relevant to the legal issues that were the focus of the research. The results of this study maintained fair legal certainty which was an important thing during the current Covid-19 pandemic. Online examination had not been regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, so that the minutes of online examinations were expected to be valid evidence in court and had binding evidence. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the existing laws and regulations were not sufficient to support the law enforcement process during the COVID-19 pandemic as expected due to a legal vacuum and technical regulations.


Keywords


Law Enforcement; Covid-19 Pandemic; Polri

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbar, M. F. (2019). Pengaruh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi di Bidang Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dengan Perubahan KUHAP. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(3), 466–487.

Ashofa, B. (2010). Metode Penelitian Hukum. PT. Rineka Cipta.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study.

Fatah, M. A. (2015). Standar Kelengkapan Administrasi Berita Acara Pemeriksaan Penyidik Dalam Prapenuntutan Pelaksanaan Pasal 110 KUHAP (Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Malang) [PhD Thesis]. University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

Harahap, M. Y. (2010). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. Sinar Grafika.

Ishaq, I. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, serta Disertasi. Alfabeta.

Iswantoro, W. (2020). Persidangan Pidana Secara Online, Respon Cepat Ma Hadapi Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis (Selisik), 6(1), 56–63.

Krisnawan, D. H., & Setiawan, M. A. (2021). Pelaksanaan Sidang Perkara Pidana Secara Online Dikaitkan dengan Asas Persidangan Terbuka Untuk Umum.

Lumbanraja, A. D. (2020). Perkembangan Regulasi dan Pelaksanaan Persidangan Online di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Crepido, 2(1), 46–58.

Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2003). Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction (Edisi ke-5). Longman.

Meidyana, N. M. R., & Putra, I. B. W. (2018). Keabsahan Pemeriksaan Saksi Melalui Teleconference Dalam Sidang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Program Kekhususan Peradilan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Siregar, R. M. D. (2017). Legalitas Keterangan Saksi Melalui Teleconference Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 5(1), 25–33.

Suhaimi, S. (2021). Peran Penasihat Hukum Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Terdakwa Dalam Persidangan Online Di Era Covid-19. JUSTITIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 8(3), 255–263.

Tabah, M. J. (2021). Kekuatan Pembuktian Berita Acara Pemeriksaan Saksi Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Persidangan. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(2), 969–979.

Tarmizi, T. (2021). Model Teleconference pada Persidangan Perkara Pidana Sebagai Solusi Penegakan Hukum Akibat Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Edukasi Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(1), 552–555.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i6.3846

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.