Authentic Assessment Approach For Learning the Classical Dance of Yogyakarta Style

Dwi Ari Marganita, Kun Setyaning Astuti

Abstract


Authentic Assessment is an assessment that is integrated with learning and is an evaluation of the outcome of students' learning activities in disciplines, Attitudes, and Skills. By using the right techniques in order to prove that students have achieved learning goals. The purpose of authentic assessment is to get a true portrait of the competition from the learners, so this assessment becomes important to do. Based on this, this study will discuss the understanding of authentic assessment and its application to the learning of classical dance arts in Yogyakarta Style. The application of authentic assessment in the subjects of Classical Dance of Yogyakarta style is very interesting to do along with the purpose of very complex learning, one of the goals of learning Classical Dance of Yogyakarta style is learning about manners and it hopes can form the character of students to be better. Therefore, the assessment of dance learning needs to look at two aspects that specifically construct the assessment in the parts of this study, namely aesthetic experience and artistic skills. The result of this research is the concept of an authentic assessment approach to the learning of Classical Dance of Yogyakarta Style.


Keywords


Assessment; Authentic; Learning of Classical Dance of Yogyakarta Style

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, A., Y. Kamin, and A. N. Nasir. 2017. “Applying Psychomotor Domain for Competency Based Teaching in Vocotional Educatione.” Jurnal of Phisics (Internasional Post Graduate Conference on Applied Science & Physics 2017). Doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1049/1/012049.

Anderson, L. W., and D. R. Krathwohl. 2010. Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Purtaka Pelajar.

Bloom, B. S., M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Obyectives. The Classification of Educational Goal. London: A By David Mckay Company, INC.

Dick, Walter, Lou Carey, and J. Carey. 2001. The Systematic Design of Instruction. South Florida: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.

Priansa, Donni Juni. 2017. Pengembangan Strategi & Model Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Retnawati, H., S. Hadi, and A. C Nugraha. 2016. “Vocational High Scool Teachers’ Difficulties in Implementing the Assesmen in Curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia.” International Jurnal of Instructional. Diakses melalui http://www.eiji.net/dosyalar/iji_2016_1_3.pdf

Sani, R. A. 2016. Penilaian Autentik. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Sasmintamardawa, R. L., dan Pamong SMKI Yogyakarta. 1983. Tuntunan Pelajaran Tari Klasik Gaya Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Ikatan Keluarga SMKI KONRI Yogyakarta.

SDFSC. 2020. “The Learning Process.” Diakses melalui http://iceskatingresorces.org/PsychomotorDomainTaxonomy.html

Setiadi, Hari. 2016. “Pelaksanaan Penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013.” Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan 20:167. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173.

Sumintono, Bambang, and Wahyu Widhiarso. 2015. Aplikasi Pemodelan RASCH Pada Assesment Pendidikan. Cimahi: Penerbit Trim Komunikata.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i4.3620

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.