Effects of Explicit Corrective Feedback with Metalinguistic Explanations on Oral Productions of English Tenses: Iranian EFL Learners’ Attitudes

Nasrin Shokrpour, Leila Zarei, Amir Yousef Farahmandi

Abstract


The current classroom study was conducted to investigate the EFL learners' attitudes towards corrective feedback (CF) mediations after speaking assessment tasks on their effects on learning four English tenses. To do that,27 upper-intermediate participants were randomly allocated to the experimental group and 27 students to the control group. The sample was taken based on convenience sampling regarding their scores on a model of Oxford Placement Test. This study consisted of a pre-test, treatment, a post-test, and an attitudinal questionnaire. To confirm the validity and reliability of the pre-test speaking questions, we conducted a pilot test on a number of students. Faqeih's (2012) questionnaire was used in this study to measure the participants' attitudes towards picture-cued task, error correction in general, and explicit CF on speaking assessment. Using t-test, the data were analyzed for the first research question and the results revealed that the experimental group performed more effectively in learning four English tenses than the control group after being provided with CF. A One-way ANOVA was also run to analyze the attitudinal questionnaire. The study also indicated that participants had positive attitudes towards receiving explicit CF after speaking assessment. The current study can contribute to improving oral skills of EFL Iranian learners after being provided with CF.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amini, D., & Ashrafi, S. (2019). Effects of feedback timing and willingness to communicate on the acquisition of simple past form.Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies,6(2),27-52.

Ammar, A. (2006). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12, 183–210.

Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). Size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.

Azimi Amoli, F. (2020). The effect of oral metalinguistic corrective feedback on learners’ knowledge of pronoun among Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10 (6), 672-677. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1006.07

Babanoğlu, M. P., & Ağçam, R. (2015). Corrective feedback in primary EFL classrooms in Turkey 1. American International Journal of Social Science, 4(3), 90-101. file:///C:/Users/Dell/Downloads/2015_AJSS_CorrectiveFeedback.pdf

Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constrains in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235-249.

Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on the language learning potential of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 348-363.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2),193-214.

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205.

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(1), 81–109.

Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment principles and classroom practices (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.

Carroll, S., Roberge, Y., & Swain, M. (1992). The role of feedback in second language acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalization. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 173-198.

Clahsen, H., & Hong, U. (1995). Agreement and null subjects in German L2 development: new evidence from reaction-time experiments. Second Language Research, 11, 57-87.

Corder, S. (1974). Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. In J. Richard (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 158-171). Essex: Longman.

Dlaska, A. Krekeler, Ch. (2013). The short-term effects of individual corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation. System, 41(1), 25-37.

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal, 1, 3-18.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.

Faqeih, H. I. (2012). The effectiveness of error correction during oral interaction: experimental studies with English l2 learners in the United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia. (Doctor Dissertation). University of York, Department of Education.

Faqeih, H., & Marsden, E. (2014). Oral corrective feedback and learning of English modals. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 322 – 329.

Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constrains on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78-104.

Guchte, M.V.D., & Braaksma, M. (2015). Learning new grammatical structures in task-based language learning: The effects of recasts and prompts. The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 246-262.

Hanh, Ph. Th., & Xuan Tho, Ph. (2018). Oral corrective feedback in EFL/ESL classrooms: Classification models. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34(5), 40-48.

Hashemian, M., & Farhang-Ju, M. (2018). Effects of metalinguistic feedback on grammatical accuracy of Iranian field (in)dependent L2 learners’ writing ability. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 141-161.

Hashemian, M., Jafarpour, A., & Adibpour, M. (2015). Exploring relationships between field (in)dependence, multiple intelligences, and L2 reading performance among Iranian L2 learners. Research in Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 40-63.

Hendrickson, J. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. Modern Language Journal, 62(8), 387-398.

Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Ibrahim, A.A. & Bello, U. (2020). The Washback Effect of WAEC/SSCE English Test of Orals on Teachers Methodology in Senior Secondary Schools in Sokoto Metropolis. English Language Teaching, 13 (1), 180-189.

Jean, G. & D. Simard. (2011). Grammar learning in English and French L2: Students’ and teachers’ beliefs and perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 465–492.

Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology,21,60-99.

Karami, M., & Heidari Darani, L. (2018). Impact of Prompts as Corrective Feedback Strategy on Teaching /θ/ and /ð/ among Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research, 6 (24), 67-82.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323987208_Impact_of_Prompts_as_Corrective_Feedback_Strategy_on_Teaching_th_and_d_among_Iranian_Intermediate_EFL_Learners [accessed Sep 22 2020].

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.

Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. The Modern Language Journal, 66(2), 140–149.

Lardiere, D. (1998). Case and tense in the fossilization steady state. Second Language Research, 14, 1-26.

Lee, A. & Lyster, R. (2016). The effects of corrective feedback on instructed L2 speech perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1): 35–64.

Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365.

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in Communicative Language Teaching: Effects on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie, & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–68). New York: Academic Press.

Long, M. (2006). The story so far. In M. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 75-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Long, M. H. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL quarterly, 19(2), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586827

Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. J. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Loewen, S., Li. S, Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). L2 learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 91–104.

Lyster,R.(2004).Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction.SSLA,26,399–432.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.

Lyster, R., & Satio, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom in SLA: A meta-Analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265 – 302.

Lyster, R., Saito, k., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1-40. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000365

Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405–430.

Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.

Mansouri Zadeh, K., & Abdullah, Kh. I. (2014). The effects of oral and written meta-linguistic feedback on ESL students writing. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 20(02),117-126.

McFerren, K. (2015). Order of acquisition a comparison of L1 and L2 English and Spanish morpheme acquisition. (Senior Thesis) in the Honors Program Liberty University.

Nassaji, H. (2016). Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 535-562.

Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.

Park, G.P. (1995). Language learning strategies and beliefs about language learning of university students learning English in Korea. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(06), 2102A. (UMI No.9534918).

Pawlak, M. (2017). Error correction in the foreign language classroom. 10.1007/978-3-642-38436-3

Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. M. Norris and L. Ortega (Eds.). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133- 164). New York: John Benjamin Publishing.

Ryan, L. (2012). Students' attitudes towards corrective feedback in the second language classroom. Unpublished manuscript, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Ireland.

Sabra, A. (2020). Tense and aspect in the English language: A study about newly arrived students with Arabic as their mother tongue. (Student thesis). Faculty of Education and Business Studies Department of Humanities. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1429992/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Sabahi, A., & Rabbani Yekta. (2019). Enhancing the accuracy of the use of verb tenses by Iranian intermediate EFL students through MALL: The case of English grammar ultimate software app. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Translation Studies, 4 (1), 89-104.

Saito, K. & Lyster.R (2012). Effects of form‐focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, DIO: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00639.x

Sarandi, H., & Çelik, M. (2019). The Effects of explicit recasts and output-only prompts on learning L2 grammar. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34(4), 981-998. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2018043537

Saslow, S., & Ascher, A. (2013). Top Notch: English for today's world, Summit 1A. Tehran, Iran: Ghazal Publications.

Saslow, S., & Ascher, A. (2013). Top Notch: English for today's world, Summit 1B. Tehran, Iran: Ghazal Publications.

Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206 – 226.

Schulz, R. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 343–364.

Schwartz, B. (1993). Explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147-163.

Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263–300.

Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361 – 392.

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.

Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.593-607). New York: Routledge.

Simamora, J. M, Sembiring, N., & Pangaribuan, J.J. (2018). Students’ speaking skills by using picture-cued media to the eighth-grade students of SMP Aanto Yoseph Medan. KAIROS ELT JOURNAL, 2 (2), 111-127.

Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. (2009). Interaction in second/foreign language classrooms. In A. Mackey, & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple Perspectives on Interaction: Second Language Research in Honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 157-174). London: Routledge.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook, & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing class. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.

Ul Hassan, M., & Dzakiria, H. (2019). The University Students’ Beliefs towards Corrective Feedback in Learning English as Foreign Language in Pakistan. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8, (3), 4094-4100.

Unsal Sakiroglu, H. (2020). Oral corrective feedback preferences of university students in English communication classes. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 6(1), 172-178.

Vahdani Sanavi, R., & Nemati. M. (2014). The effect of six different corrective feedback strategies on Iranian English language learners’ IELTS writing task 2. SAGE Open, 1–9. DOI: 10.1177/2158244014538271 sgo.sagepub.com

William, D. (2013). Assessment: The bridge between teaching and learning. Voices from the Middle, 21, 15-20.

White, L. (2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 129-141.

Yilmaz, Y. (2012). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34(3):344-368. DOI: 10.1093/applin/ams044

Zarei, M., Ahour, T., & Seifoori, Z. (2019). The effects of implicit, explicit, and emergent oral feedback on Iranian EFL learners' accuracy, fluency, and attitude. Journal of Language Horizons, 2(2), 75-102.

Zhai, K., & Gao, X. (2018). Effects of corrective feedback on EFL speaking task complexity in China’s university classroom. Cogent Education, 5 (1485472), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1485472




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i3.3600

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.