Analysis of Criminal Liability Abuse of Authority in the Crime of Corruption on Behalf of Nimrod E Sihombing
Abstract
Criminal liability related to abuse of authority was still very difficult to target the private sector in relation to corruption in the procurement of goods and services. The purpose of this writing is to find out criminal liability for perpetrators of corruption crimes who borrow companies owned by others without a transfer of work agreement (subcontract) and the application of articles of abuse of authority that will later become the basis of criminal liability for it so that in the future the company's borrowers can be punished according to their crime and create legal justice for the community. This paper presents examples of relevant cases, discusses the issue of abuse of authority by the private sector and how the article on abuse of authority in the corruption law can be used to ensnare the perpetrators and is associated with the criminal role they play. The result of this writing is that criminals in the private sector can be subject to abuse of authority related to the Crime of Corruption because it meets the element of abusing "opportunity or means" because of the "position" that exists in it as stipulated in Article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Atmasasmita, R. (2000). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana (2nd ed.). Mandar Maju.
Atmasudirjo, P. (1991). Hukum Administrasi Negara (4th ed.). Ghalia Indonesia.
Chazawi, A. (2016). Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia (Edisi Revisi). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hadjon, P. M. (2000). Tentang Wewenang yang dimuat dalam Gema Peratun, Tahun IV, Nomor 12, Triwulan III, Agustus 2000. In Lingkungan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Mahkamah Agung RI. Lingkungan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta.
Hamzah, A. (1986). Komentar terhadap putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia terbaru mengenai korupsi. Indo Hillco.
Hamzah, A. (2008). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. PT. Yarsif Watampone.
Lamintang, P. A. F. (2013). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Marbun, S. F. (2004). Analisa Teoritik Yuridis Kasus Ir. Akbar Tandjung dari Optik Hukum Administrasi. In Putusan Perkara Akbar Tandjung.
Moeljatno. (2002). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana (4th ed.). PT. Rineka Cipta.
Muladi, & Priyatno, D. (1991). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dalam Hukum Pidana (1st ed.). Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung.
Pound, R. (2017). An introduction to the philosophy of Law. In An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351288880
Pramono, W. (2016). Korupsi dan Pidana Lainnya Sebuah Perspektif Jaksa & Guru Besar. PT. Kompas Media Nusantara.
Prodjohamidjojo, M. (1997). Memahami dasar-dasar hukum Pidana Indonesia. PT. Pradnya Paramita.
Sianturi, S. R. (1996). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Penerapanya (4th ed.). Alumni Ahaem-Peteheam.
Soedarto. (1977). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Alumni.
Toegarisman, M. A. (2016). Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Paradigma Efisiensi. PT. Kompas Media Nusantara.
Wirjono, P. (1989). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. PT. Eresco.
Wiyono, R. (2012). Pembahasan Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (2nd ed.). Sinar Grafika.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i1.3415
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.