Development of STEM-Based Distance and Time Speed Tool to Improve Critical Thinking Ability of Elementary School Students

Fani Dwi Arini, Makmuri Makmuri, Erry Utomo

Abstract


This research develops teaching aids for mathematics learning materials of distance, speed, and time. The making of this teaching aid is based on the needs of innovative learning, the needs of students, the results of previous research on the problem of learning difficulties in terms of speed, distance, and time. The results of the initial observation of the need for teaching aids stated that mathematics learning materials about distance, speed and time needed the right teaching aids. The teaching aids developed are designed as attractive as possible to improve independent learning at school and home. This learning aid is made interesting with the Tamiya 4D game method that is suitable for elementary school students. The research and development method used is the ADDIE Model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) which is a learning device development model. This model was developed by the ADDIE development model which consists of 5 main stages, namely: (1) analyzing (2) design (3) developing (4) implementing, and (5) evaluating. This method and model was chosen because it aims to produce a product in the form of Tamiya props material speed, distance, and time. The product that was developed was then tested for feasibility with validity and product trials to determine the extent to which students' critical thinking was developed after learning using Tamiya props on STEM-based speed, distance, and time-based materials. The results of the validation of material experts, linguists, and media experts show that the evaluation results show the quality of teaching aids by material experts is classified as a very good category with a score of 82, 44%. The quality of teaching aids by linguists is classified as very good with a category score of 87.75%. The quality of teaching aids by media experts is classified as very good with a category score of 85%. The results of the teacher's response test are included in the very good category with a score of 86.93%. Based on the percentage of score acquisition, it can be concluded that the teaching aids for solving problems on questions about distance, speed, and time materials are appropriate for use in learning activities.


Keywords


STEM-Based Mathematics Teaching Aids; Tamiya; Critical Thinking; Elementary School

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acesta, A., Sumantri, M. S., Fahrurrozi, F., Iasha, V., & Setiawan, B. (2021). Natural Scıence Learnıng Module Based on Multıple Intellıgences in Elementary Schools. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(4), 739–749.

Almaiah, M. A., Jalil, M. @. M. A., & Man, M. (2016). Empirical investigation to explore factors that achieve high quality of mobile learning system based on students’ perspectives. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 19(3), 1314–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.03.004

Asrifah, S., Solihatin, E., Arif, A., Rusmono, & Iasha, V. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan Siswa Kelas V SDN Pondok Pinang 05. Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 16(30 SE-), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol16.no30.a2719

Bakırcı, H., & Karışan, D. (2017). Investigating the Preservice Primary School, Mathematics and Science Teachers’ STEM Awareness. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i1.2807

Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of Augmented Reality in Science Learning: Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9

Dkk, S. R. (2020). the Stem Approach : the Development of Rectangular.

Graphs, R. A., Graphs, R. A., Mathematics, P., Primary, E., & Education, M. (n.d.). Reasoning about graphs in.

Herlandy, P. B., Nur, R., & Syofiah, A. (2020). Preliminary research: augmented reality and its implementation in the basic moves group of the tapak suci putera muhammadiyah martial arts. 1, 152–157.

Hott, B. L., Dibbs, R. A., Naizer, G., Raymond, L., Reid, C. C., & Martin, A. (2019). Practitioner Perceptions of Algebra Strategy and Intervention Use to Support Students With Mathematics Difficulty or Disability in Rural Texas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 38(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870518795494

Irawan, S., & Iasha, V. (2021). Core Learning Model and Mathematical Disposition, Against Mathematics Problem Solving Ability of Elementary School Students. Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 17(2), 122–129.

Rachamatika, T., M. Syarif Sumantri, Agung Purwanto, Jatu Wahyu Wicaksono, Alrahmat Arif, & Vina Iasha. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Dan Kemandirian Belajar Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis IPA Siswa Kelas V SDN Di Jakarta Timur. Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 17(1 SE-), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol17.no1.a3162

Permanasari, A. (2016). STEM Education: Inovasi dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 2016–2023.

Saiful, A., Farid, M., Suminar, T., Wringinjajar, N., & Tengah, J. (2019). Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Pengembangan Mobile Learning Pendidikan Matematika Realistis di sekolah dasar. 8(2), 169–175

Sari, Y., Luvita, R. D., Cahyaningtyas, A. P., Iasha, V., & Setiawan, B. (2020). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Struktural Analitik Sitentik terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Permulaan di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 1125–1133.

Setiawan, B., Apri Irianto, S. H., & Rusminati, S. H. (2021). DASAR-DASAR PENDIDIKAN: Kajian Teoritis Untuk Mahasiswa PGSD. CV Pena Persada.

Sudrajat, A., Meiliana Lovienica, & Vina Iasha. (2021). Pengaruh Model Resource Based Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (IPS) Siswa Kelas IV SD Sekolah Dasar. Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 17(1 SE-), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol17.no1.a3217

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Taylor, L. (2004). Educational Theories and Instructional Design Models. Their Place in Simulation. Health.

Utomo, G. M., Setiawan, B., Rachmadtullah, R., & Iasha, V. (2021). What Kind of Learning Media do You Want? Need Analysis On Elementary School Online Learning. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 4299–4305.

Yustitia, V., Fanny, A. M., Kusmaharti, D., & Setiawan, B. (2021). Aplikasi Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis TIK: PPM Bagi Guru SD Hang Tuah X Sedati. Manggali; Vol 1 No 2 (2021): ManggaliDO - 10.31331/Manggali.V1i2.1692 . http://e-journal.ivet.ac.id/index.php/manggali/article/view/1692




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i1.3392

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.