Charles Sander Pierce Semiotic Analysis of Symbolic Meaning on Kriya Art of Panji Mask Cirebon
Abstract
The local community in Mandarangan Village in Cirebon is located in the Kasepuhan palace area, which is often known as a cultural heritage of its ancestors, and so that many master craftsmen including craftsmen of Panji mask are born. The art of Panji mask craft has some interesting symbols to study. The art of Indonesian Panji Cirebon masks in the village of Slangit has many varieties of meanings in the form of visualization, which brings various interpretations to mask art lovers. This study aims to determine the symbolic meaning contained in the Cirebon style Panji mask using the semiotic approach of Charles Sander Pierce. The research shows that (1) the Cirebon style banner mask which is composed of visual symbols, namely tanpa jamang, nanggal sepisan eyebrows, menjangan ranggah eyebrows, leyepan eyes, kedhelen eyes, walimiring nose, prengesan mouth, white color all of these symbols are stylized from the shape of objects natural. (2) The structure of the visual symbolism of the Cirebon style Panji Mask which contains character values consisting of the shape of the eyebrows, eyes, nose, mouth and color. All symbolic structures are stylized forms of natural objects with character values of sacred, loyal, obedient, honest, innocent, simple, smooth, gentle, dashing, smart, wise, cheerful, and smiling or friendly.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Affan, F. 2015. “Pembelajaran Seni Kriya Topeng Sebagai, Upaya Pembentukan Karakter Kreatif Siswa Kelas XI IPA 1 SMAN5 Tegal”. Semarang: UNS Semarang
Budiman, Kris. 2011. Semiotik Visual: Konsep, Isu, dan Problem Ikonisitas. Yogyakarta: Jalasu- tra.
Dyah, A. 2007. “Makna Simbolis pada Unsur Visual Kostum Tari Topeng Babakan Cirebon Keni Arja di Desa Slangit”. ITB Jurnal Visual Art. Vol. 1, No. 2, 224-245.
Fauzan. 2016. “Makna Simbolik Topeng Sakura Pada Masyarakat adat Lampung”. Kalam: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam. Vol. 10, No. 1, 223-255.
Gustami, SP. (1992). Filosofi Seni Kriya Tradisional Indonesia dalam Seni: Jurnal Pengetahuan dan Penciptaan Seni. II/01-Januari. Yogyakarta: BP ISI Yogyakarta.
Haryono, Timbul. (2002). Terminologi dan Perwujudan Seni Kriya Masa Lalu dan Masa Kini sebuah Pendekatan Historis-Arkeologi. Makalah. Yogyakarta: ISI Yogyakarta.
Hidayat Robby. 2008. Wayang Topeng Malang. Malang: Gantar Gumelar.
Hidajat, R. 2013. “Transformasi Karakter Tokoh Drama Tari Wayang Topeng di Kabupaten Malang, Jawa Timur”. Patrawidya: Sejarah dan Budaya. 14(2), 231-248.
____________, 2014. Fungsi dan Proses Pembuatan Topeng di Kabupaten Malang Jatim, Jurnal.
Jowo Atmaja. 1992. Mengungkap Bahasa Topeng. Basis edisi XLI No 1 1992. Yogyakarta: Basis.
Martono. 1994. Topeng dalam Perkembangan Budaya. Yogyakarta: Cakrawala Pendidikan No/XIII/1994.
Martono, dkk. 2017. “Topeng Etnik Nusantara Dalam Perkembangan Global”. Mudra: Jurnal Seni Budaya. Vol. 32, No. 1, 123-130.
Sahid, Nur. 2016. “Semiotika Untuk Teater, Tari, Wayang Purwa, dan Film”. Yogyakarta: Gigih Pustaka Mandiri.
Sedyawati, Edi. Topeng dalam Budaya. Jakata: Gramedia.
Supriyanto Heri,Solah A P.1997. Drama Tari Wyang Topeng Malang. Malang: Padepokan Seni Magun Dharmo.
Wulandhary Diyah ayuningsih. 2008. Kujang, Bedog, dan Topeng dan kajian lainnya mengenai Budaya Sunda. Bandung Pusat Studi Sunda.
Van Zoest, Aart, Semiotika: Tentang Tanda, Cara Kerjanya dan Apa yang kita Lakukan Dengannya (Jakarta: Yayasan Sumber Agung, 1993)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i2.3370
Refbacks
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.