The Profile of Students with Moderate Initial Statistical Thinking Ability in Analyzing and Interpreting Data

Novi Dya Meylasari, Imam Sujadi, Sri Subanti

Abstract


Statistical thinking is a thinking process related to the ability to understand how to describe, organize, reduce, present, analyze and interpret the data that apply the statistical understanding in real problems. Most students had a difficulty in analyzing and interpreting data. They claimed that analyzing and interpreting data is a difficult and complicated assignment since it needs high level skill, accuracy, careful consideration and objective attitude. If the data is analyzed and interpreted well, we will draw the correct conclusion. Mooney's research states that there are five levels of statistical thinking in a statistical thinking framework, including: level 1: Idiosyncratic; level 2: Transitional; level 3: Quantitative; level 4: Analytical, and level 5: Extended Analytical. This research aims to describe the profile of the level of statistical thinking of students with moderate initial abilities in analyzing and interpreting data. The subjects of this research were two eighth graders with moderate initial abilities in Junior High School of 1 Walisongo, Semarang. Think Aloud method is applied to collect data. The results showed that the level of students with moderate initial statistical thinking abilities was at level 2: Transitional, in which students tried to present their ideas through quantitative and subjective thinking, indicated by naive thinking, hesitant, incomplete responses in counting, and only focus on one aspect of the data display.

 

Keywords


Statistical Thinking; Statistical Thinking Level; Analyzing and Interpreting Data Process

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, A.H. & Maheran, U.H. (2017). Tahap Pemikiran Statistik Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Di Daerah Ledang. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/317542871.

Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2017). Analisis Hasil Survei Kebutuhan Data Katalog 1399013. Jakarta: CV Nario Sari.

Bolster, L. C., Boyer, C., Butts, T., Cavanagh, M., Channel, M.W., Crown,W. D., Fair, J., Hamada, R.Y., Kelly,M. G., Leiva, M., Lindquist, M. M., Nibbelink,W. B., Proudfit, L., Rahifs, C., Ramirez, R., Ramos, J. F., Robinette, G., Robitaille, D., Schultz, J. E., Shepardson, R., Swafford, J., Tucker, B., Van deWalle, J.,Williams, D. E., &Winser, R. J. (1994). Exploring mathematics: Teacher’s edition grade 1. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

Chan, S.W, & Zaleha Ismail. (2014). Developing Statistical Reasoning Assessment Instrument for High School Students in Descriptive Statistics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4338-4343.

Chapin, S. H., Illingworth, M., Landau, M. S., Masingila, J. O., & McCracken, L. (1997). Middle grades math tools for success: Teacher’s edition course 3. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Charles, R. I., Dossey, J. A., Leinwand, S. J., Seeley, C. L., Vonder Embse, C. B., Bolster, L. C., Caldwell, J. H., Cooley, D. A., Crown,W. D., Proudfit, L., Ramirez, A. B., Ramos, J. F., Renfro, F. L., Robitalle, D. F., & Swafford, J. (1998). Middle school math: Teacher’s edition, course 3, volume 1. Menlo Park, CA: Scott Foresman/Addison-Wesley.

Curcio, F. R. (1987). Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 382–393.

Garfield,J. (2003). Assessing Statististical Reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(1),22-38.

Groth, Randall E. (2003). Development of a High School Statistical Thinking Framework. A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor. Illinois: Philosophy Department of Mathematics Illinois State University.

Jones, Thornton, Langrall & Mooney. (2000). A Framework for Characterizing Children’s Statistical Thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(4), 269–307 Copyright © 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Martadiputra B A P & Suryadi Didi. (2012). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Statistis Mahasiswa S1 Melalui Pembelajaran MEAs yang Dimodifikasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung 1, No.1, Februari 2012.

Masjudin M, Muzaki A, Abidin Z, & Ariyanti I.A.P. (2020). Analysis of Student’s Statistical Thinking Ability in Understanding the Statistical Data. J Physics Conf Ser 1521 032063.

Meylasari N D, Sujadi I, and Subanti S. (2020). The Profile of 8th Graders’ Level of Statistical Thinking: a Case of Analyzing and Interpreting Data. Young Scholar Symposium on Science Education and Environment (YSSSEE) 2020. Bandar Lampung: UIN Raden Intan Lampung.

Miles, Mathew B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications.

Mooney, E.S. (2002). A Framework for Characterizing Middle School Students' Statistical Thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4:1, 23-63, DOI: 10.1207/S15327833MTL0401_2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0401_2.

Muslimah, N. (2019). Profil Level Berpikir Statistis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Surabaya: UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.. https://www.digilib.uinsby.ac.id.

National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectation of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author.

National Council of Teachers of English & International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for the english language arts. Urbana, IL: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

Nazariah, N., & Abidin, Z. (2017). Intuisi siswa SMK dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika dan perbedaan gender. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 4(1), 35-52.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 37. (2018). Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta.

Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1991). What work requires of schools: ASCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: Department of Labor. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332 054).

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suriasumantri, S Jujun. (2003). Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Ulusoy, C.K., & Mesture, K.A. (2017). Analyzing the Statistical Reasioning Levels of Preservice Elementry School Teachers in the Context of Model Electing Activity. International journal of Reaserch in Education and Science, 3(1). issn: 2148-9955. https://ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/viewFile/132/96.

Wild, C.J. and Maxine, P. (1999). Statistical Thinking in Empirical Enquiry. lnternational Statistical Revim ( IW). 67,3. 223-265. Printed in Mexico.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i1.2245

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.