Legal Implications of the Decision of the Constitutional Court (Cases Number 57, 58, 59 and 63 / PUU-XIV / 2016, Concerning Application for Material Testing of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2016 Concerning Tax Waivers)
Abstract
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2016 concerning Tax Amnesty is a regulation from the government as part of increasing tax revenue in Indonesia. Tax amnesty is considered to have various deficiencies that injure the value of justice and constitutionality. Review of laws that have been decided by the Constitutional Court with Decisions Number 57, 58, 59 AND 63 / PUU-XIV/2016 and strengthen the a quo law to remain valid in Indonesia. This decision is considered inconsistent with social and legal facts that occur in society. This study intends to answer and analyze how the Constitutional Court’s considerations on the examination of the Tax Amnesty Act and to analyze the legal implications after the Constitutional Court decision.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alberto F, 2016 Pengaruh Kebijakan Pengampunan Pajak (Tax Amnesty) Oleh Pemerintah Terhadap Potensi Peningkatan Penerimaan Pajak di Indonesia Tahun 2015 J. Ilm. Univ. Bakrie.
Advianto L Y H S, 2018 Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Hukum Hak Hak Wajib Pajak dalam Sistem Hukum Pajak Indonesia Simp. Nas. Keuang. Negara.
Bram D Al, 2017 Fasilitas Perpajakan (Tax Holiday) Pembebasan Atau Pengurangan Pajak Penghasilan Badan Bagi Perusahaan Industri (Kalangan Dunia Usaha) Yang Melakukan Penanaman Modal Di Indonesia J. Huk. Pembang.
Fenochietto R and Pessino C, 2013 Understanding Countries’ Tax Effort IMF Work. Pap.
Puspitasari C D and Ll M, 2012 Puspitasari, C. D., & Ll, M. (2012). Hukum pajak. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.Hukum pajak Yogyakarta Univ. Negeri Yogyakarta.
Miraj A, 2019 Hukum Pajak Transf. Pricing di Indones.
Agung I and Kawuryan E S, 2018 Implikasi Akta Nominee Sebagai Dasar Permohonan Pengampunan Pajak Al-Daulah J. Huk. dan Perundangan Islam.
Offe C and Keane J, 2018 Contradictions of the welfare state .
Michael T, 2020 Kesulitan Dalam Memaknai Kesempurnaan Informasi Era Covid-19 Adalah Bul. Huk. dan Keadilan.
Brockmann H Genschel P and Seelkopf L, 2016 Happy taxation: Increasing tax compliance through positive rewards? J. Public Policy.
Hadi, Seno Sudarmono dan R T B, 2018 Pengaruh Pelaksanaan Pengampunan Pajak (Tax Amnesty ) Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Pada KPP Pratama Jakarta Cengkareng Moneter.
James S and Alley C, 2002 Tax compliance, self-assessment and tax administration J. Financ. Manag. Public Serv.
Darmayasa I N and Aneswari Y R, 2016 The Role Of Local Wisdom to Tax Compliance J. Akunt. Multiparadigma.
Hayat H, 2015 Keadilan Sebagai Prinsip Negara Hukum: Tinjauan Teoritis dalam Konsep Demokrasi PADJADJARAN J. Ilmu Huk. (Journal Law).
Simanungkalit T B, 2017 Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Pbb P2 Di Kota Tebing Tinggi Provinsi Sumatera Utara J. Ilmu Adm. Media Pengemb. Ilmu dan Prakt. Adm.
onlinepajak.com, 2018, Apa itu Pajak Langsung dan Tidak Langsung?, Apa itu Pajak Langsung dan Tidak Langsung? .
Sa’adah N, 2018 Kebijakan Pengampunan Pajak (Tax Amnesty) Berdasarkan Keadilan Yang Mendukung Iklim Investasi Indonesia Masal. Huk.
W P, 2016 Penyamaan Persepsi Dan Kerjasama Dalam Pemeriksaan Di Bidang Perpajakan Untuk Mendukung Optimalisasi Penerimaan Negara Yust. J. Huk.
Hidayat S, 2019 Pemidanaan Korporasi Terkait Transfer Pricing Di Bidang Perpajakan Rechtidee.
Sinaga H D P, 2018 The Criminal Liability of Corporate Taxpayer in the Perspective of Tax Law Reform in Indonesia Mimb. Huk. - Fak. Huk. Univ. Gadjah Mada.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i11.2159
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.