The Study of Code-Mixing Phenomenon on the Trials Held by Madiun Military Court
Abstract
This current research attempts to describe and explain the phenomenon of a speech event so-called code-mixing with military trials held by Madiun Military Court as the setting. The descriptions are based on (1) types and (2) factors attributing the code-mixing phenomenon. The source of data for this study is the utterances spoken by social components during the trials (juries, auditors, witnesses, victims, and defendants). Meanwhile, the data for this study are the application of code mixing. The data were collected through participative study method with noticing and recording technique. Meanwhile the secondary data of this study are the information related to the trials process obtained by conducting document study on official reports. In maintaining the validity, the current study employs method and data triangulation. The data were analyzed through interlingual and extralingual reference on the basis of Sociolinguistics. There are four lingual forms correlating to the code mixing namely (1) words (2) phrases (3) baster (4) and repetition. Those lingual realizations of code mixing are found to be attributable to four factors namely (1) habit (2) vocabulary mastery (3) humor (4) and interlocutor influence.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, Wakit (2014). Buku Ajar Etnolinguistik: Teori, Metode, dan Aplikasinya. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Blaxter, L., Hughes, C., dan Thight, M (2006). How to Research: Seluk Beluk Melakukan Research. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Fishman, J. A (1972). The Sosiology of Language. Massachussetts: Newburry House Publication.
Fitrizal, Imam Laili dan Eriza Nelfi. (2013). Analisis Bentuk Campur Kode di Pengadilan Negeri Kabupaten Padang Pariaman. Abstract of Undergraduate Research, Faculty of Humanities, Bung Hatta University, 3(1): 1-12.
Geoffrey, Leech (1993). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Halliday, M.A.K. et. al (1970). The Users and Uses of Language. The Hague: Mouton.
Handoko, Duwi (2015). Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. Pekanbaru: Penerbit Hawa Dan Ahwa.
Kachru, Braj. B (1978). Toward structuring Code Mixing. Paris: Mouto.
Mahsun (2012). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Stratehgi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Moleong, L. J (1989). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Remaja Karya.
Pakaya, Usman. (2017). Bahasa Hukum dalam Putusan Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Negara Hukum,8(1): 151-175.
Rokhman, Fatur (2013). Sosiolinguistik: Suatu Pendekatan Pembelajaran Bahasa dalam Masyarakat Multikultural. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Santosa, Riyadi (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Kebahasaan.Surakarta: UNS Press.
Simbolon, Marlina Eliyanti (2019). Tuturan dalam Pembelajaran Berbicara dengan Metode Reciprocal Teaching. Jakarta: Penerbit Media Sahabat Cendekia.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J (2003). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Kualitatif: Tatalangkah dan Tehnik-Tehnik Teoritisasi Data. (M. Shodiq & I. Muttaqien, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sumarsono (2013). Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sundoro, Bekty Tandaningtyas, Sarwiji Suwandi, dan Budhi Setiawan (2018). Campur Kode Bahasa Jawa Banyumasan dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Retorika:Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 11(2): 129-139.
Thelander, Mats (1976). Code Switching and Code Mixing. International Journal of The Sosiology of Language, 10: 103-124.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i10.2139
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.