The Dynamics of Communication on the Identity Crisis of Malangan Mask Art in the Cultural Adaptation of Malang People

Radita Gora Tayibnapis, Tarsani Tarsani, Risqi Inayah Dwijayanti

Abstract


The bias of Malangan mask art is starting to fade. This mask art originating from Malang has lost its authenticity so that it is difficult to distinguish it from the same mask art from other regions. The social changes of the people of Kedungmonggo, as the center of the Malangan mask art, have an impact on the neglect of the authenticity of the local traditional culture. This condition ultimately invalidates the interpretation of the symbols of Malangan mask art and even threatens the sustainability of the Malangan mask art itself. This study aims to rediscover the true meaning of the characteristics of Malangan masks using semiotic and ethnographic approaches to trace the social life of the people of Kedungmonggo and to adapt Malangan mask art as a symbol of Malang traditional culture. The results show that the identity crisis of Malangan mask art occurs because of the lack of cultural literature, especially historical literature. Many stories are hidden from their true meaning as a form of story camouflage so that people believe in myths more than in histories. The life of the Kedungmonggo community is based on cultural symbols that have experienced a cultural crisis due to the flow of modern culture.

Keywords


Malangan Mask Art; Communication Dynamics; Identity Crisis; Cultural Adaptation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barthes, Roland. 2007. Petualangan Semiologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Endraswara, Suwardi.,Prof. Dr. 2015. Etnologi Jawa. Penelitian, Perbandingan, dan Pemaknaan Budaya. Jakarta: Center for Academic Publishing Service (Caps).

Hecht, Michael J., Jennifer R. Warren, Eura Jung, and Janice L. Krieger dalam Gudykunst, William B. 2005. Theorizing About Intercultural Communication. New York: Sage Publications.

Hoed, Benny (2011) dalam Riris K. Toha.2016.Krisis Budaya?. Oasis Guru Besar Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya UI. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor.

Judee K. Burgoon and Amy S. EbesuHusbarddalamGudykunst, William B. 2005.Theorizing About Intercultural Communication. New York: Sage Publications.

Kim,Y.Y.,2008. Becoming intercultural personhood: Globalization and a way of being (spesialisue). Internasional jurnal of Intercultural Relation, 32, 359-368.

Littlejhon, Stephen W. & Karen A. Foss. 2009. Encyclopedia of Communication Theories. New York: Sage Publications.

Magetsari (2011) dalamRiris K. Toha.2016.KrisisBudaya?. Oasis Guru Besar Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya UI. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor.

Raffles, Thomas Stamford. 2014. The History of Java. Yogyakarta: Narasi.

Ricklefs, M.C. 2013. MengislamkanJawa. Sejarah Islamisasi di Jawa dan Penentangnyadari 1930 sampai sekarang. Jakarta: Serambi.

Rusmana, Dadan. 2014. Filsafat Semiotika. Paradigma, teori, dan metode interpretasi tanda dari semiotika struktural hingga dekosntruksi praktis. Bandung: PenerbitPustakaSetia.

Salim, Agus. 2015. TeoridanParadigma. Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar.

Samovar, Larry A., Richard E. Porter & Edwin R. McDaniel. Komunikasi Lintas Budaya (Communication Between Cultures), Edisi 7. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Humanika & Cengage Learning, Singapore.

Suseno, Franz Magnis. 1991. Wayang dan Panggilan Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka.

Zoetmulder, P.J. 2000.ManunggalingKawulaGusti. Pantheḯsme dan Monisme Dalam Sastra Suluk Jawa.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i10.2090

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.