Phatic Communication Politness of Greating Arek Culture on Account Instagram: Pragmatic

Karina Sofiananda Armaza Faraba, Sumarlam Sumarlam, Dwi Purnanto

Abstract


Language politeness is the starting point of acceptance in speech events (Sumarlam., 2017:181). There are good intentions are meant or delivered in unfavorable or impolite ways, both in terms of word choice and external factors (intonation, mimic, pantomimic, etc.) will be interpreted differently. The data in this research is oral speech in the form of caption or writing contains cultural greetings Arek. It can be seen from the classification of data posting in account instagram @aslisuroboyo. Phatic communication of the Arek culture society consists of rek, arek, ndasmu, koen, cok, ndeng, a, gaes, lur, jembuk, bez. It uses the scale of language politeness from Brown and Levinson skala the speaker and hearer relative power (the scale of social status ratings between speakers and speech partners or commonly referred to as the rank scale of power or power rating) and the philanthropic scope of Robin Lakoff is the politeness scale of equality or kesekawanan refers to a friendly attitude and always maintain friendship between one person to another in order to be polite.


Keywords


Politeness; Phatic Communication; Arek Culture Society

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ardhiarta, Alif Alfian. ___. Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Interaksi Sosial Di Pondok Pesantren Darul Ulum Jombang:Suatu Kajian Pragmatik.Jurnal. Skriptorium, Vol 2, No.1. Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya.

Austin, J.L. (1962). How To Do Things With Word. Oxford at The Clarendon Press. London.

Edy, Djauhari. (2015). Kritik dalam Masyarakat Budaya Arek Di Surabaya: Kajian Sosiopragmatik terhadap Pemakaian Bahasa sebagai Sarana Kontrol Sosial. Disertasi. Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta.

Huang, Yan. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics. London.

I Dewa Putu Wijana dan Muhammad Rohmadi. (2011). Analisis Wacana Pragmatik: Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Yuma Pustaka. Surakarta.

I Dewa Putu Wijana. (1996). Dasar-dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi.

I Dewa Putu Wijana dan Muhammad Rohmadi. (2006). Sosiolinguistik: Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Jumanto. (2012). Teori Muka dan Kesantunan.Jurnal Lingua Komunika: tahun II, edisi 5. Universitas 17 Agustus 1945. Semarang.

Kisyani. (2004). Bahasa Jawa Di Jawa Timur Bagian Utara dan Blambangan.

Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Leech, Geoffrey. (2011). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Lubis, Hamid Hasan. (1994). Analisis Wacana Pragmatik, 1994. Angkasa. Bandung.

Mulyana. (2005). Kajian Wacana. Tiara Wacana. Yogyakarta.

Rahardi, Kunjana. (2005). Pragmatik Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Erlangga. Jakarta.

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Duta Wacana University Press. Yogyakarta.

Sudaryanto. (1990). Aneka Konsep Kedataan Lingual dalam Linguistik. Duta Wacana University Press. Yogyakarta.

Sumarlam. (2013). Teori dan Praktik Analisis Wacana. Bukukatta. Solo.

Sumarlam, Sri Pamungkas dan Ratna Susanti. (2017). Pemahaman dan Kajian Pragmatik. Bukukata. Solo.

Winiasih, Tri. (2010). Pisuhan Dalam “Basa Suroboyoan” Kajian Sosiolinguistik. Tesis. Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta.

Yanto, Yudi.___. Kesantunan Berbahasa Dalam Komunikasi Terapeutik Perawat Di Rsud Dr. Wahidin Sudiro Husodo Mojokerto: Kajian Pragmatik. Jurnal Skriptorium Vol 2 No. 2. Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i4.182

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.