The Obligation of Notary to Prevent and Eradicate Criminal Acts of Money Laundering
Abstract
Notary as general official and as a trusted person because his office has an obligation that is one of which is stipulated in article 16 paragraph (1) Letter F. The Law of Tenure Notary (hereinafter referred to UUJN) namely to keep the contents of the deed and all the information obtained in the making of the deed unless the law determines otherwise. However, in government Regulation No. 43 of 2015 on reporting Parties in the prevention and eradication of Money laundering crimes, notary Public is given the obligation to report to The Financial Transaction Reporting and Analysis Center (hereinafter referred to PPATK) regarding suspicious financial transactions conducted by its clients. So there is a conflict of norms on both provisions. This research aims to assess and analyse the arrangements and responsibilities and responsibilities of notary public in the prevention and eradication of money laundering crimes. This method of research uses normative research methods. The approach which is used in this study are the statutory approach and conceptual approach. The results of this research are regulatory obligations of notary in the prevention and eradication of Money laundering crimes against the secret obligation of the position that these two obligations are not contradicted. The notary is obliged to report to the PPATK, if the notary acts for interest or for and on behalf of the service user. If a notary is acting in accordance with the Authority as stipulated in the UUJN, the notary is not obliged to report any suspicious financial transactions made by his clients. Secondly, the obligation and responsibility of the notary in the prevention and eradication of Money Laundering Crimes is legally notarized liable for alleged criminal acts of money laundering when it acts for the benefit of or for behalf of the service user to objects that are required to be reported, by applying the principle of recognizing the service users, the principle of recognizing the benefit owners of corporations and delivering suspicious financial transaction.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Habib Adjie. (2011). Hukum Notaris Indonesia (Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris), PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung.
-----. (2018). Hukum Notariat Indonesia, printed: V, PT. Rafika Aditama, Jakarta.
Maria Farida Indrati Soeprapto. (1998). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan Dasar-Dasar dan Pembentukannya, Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Mukti Fajar ND & Yulianto Ahmad. (2013). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2016). Penelitian Hukum, printed:12, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto. (2006). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta.
Andi Khamisah, et.al., “Kewenangan Notaris dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang melalui Pembelian Saham”, Jurnal Analisis, Vol. 3 No. 2, Program Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, 2014.
Made Riyaldi, et.al., “Urgensi Pengaturan Notaris dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah sebagai Pihak Pelapor atas Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan terkait Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang”, Jurnal Hukum, Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 2014.
Eka Putri Tanjung Sari, “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Rahasia Jabatan Notaris”, Tesis, Universitas Indonesia, 2012.
Indonesia, Law No. 30 of 2004 on the Department of Notary (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2004 number 117, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia number 4432).
Indonesia, Law No. 8 of 2010 on the prevention of the anti-corruption Eradication of Money Laundering (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2010 Number 122, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia number 5164).
Indonesia, Law number 12 of 2011 on the establishment of legislation (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2011 number 82, addition to the Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia number 5234).
Indonesia, Law No. 2 of 2014 on the amendment to law Number 30 of 2004 on the Department of Notary (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 number 3, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia number 5491).
Indonesia, government regulation number 43 of 2015 about the reporter in the Prevention and eradication of Money Laundering Crimes (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2015 number 148, supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia number 5709).
Indonesia, Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 on the application of principles to recognize the benefit owners from corporations in order to prevent and eradicate the criminal Acts of Money Laundering (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2018 number 23).
Indonesia, regulation of the Minister of Law and Human rights No. 9 of 2017 on the application of the principle to recognize service users for Notary (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2017 number 1087).
Indonesia, head of financial transaction reporting and Analysis Center No. 11 of 2016 on procedures of submission of suspicious financial transaction report for the Profession (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2016 number 1896).
Indonesia, head of financial transaction reporting and Analysis Center number PER-14/1.02/PPATK/11/14 regarding the imposition of administrative sanctions for violations of reporting obligations.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i5.1688
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.