Rights and Obligations of a Country Due to Unilateral Resignation from ASEAN Membership
Abstract
Convention of unilateral resignation from ASEAN membership which has not been listed yet in ASEAN Charter can cause problems later on for ASEAN members. Therefore, the convention about the unilateral resignation should be listed on the ASEAN Charter to understand about state’s accountability and procedure for state that proposes unilateral resignation from ASEAN membership. By using statue approach method and conceptual approach, it was obtained that resignation from ASEAN membership can be committed according to congress of Vienna 1986, which can be agreed with ASEAN state members to be listed on the ASEAN Charter or on the other legal provision. Therefore, the obligation of state which takes unilateral resignation from ASEAN membership based on the convention of ASEAN Summit with the procedure of notice, a year before ASEAN Summit held. The responsibility of a country that resigns from ASEAN membership is principally based on the end of the cooperation of a member country that wants to resign with other member countries.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adolf, H. (2004). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Agusman, D. D. (2010). Hukum perjanjian internasional: kajian teori dan praktik Indonesia. Refika Aditama.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Perihal Undang-Undang di Indonesia. Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kenpaniteraan.
Cheng-Chwee, K. (2005). Multilateralism in China's ASEAN policy: Its evolution, characteristics, and aspiration. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 27(1), 102-122.
Dewanto, W. A. (2012). Memahami Arti Undang-Undang Pengesahan Perjanjian Internasional di Indonesia. Opini Juris, 4, 18-32.
Klabbers, J. (2015). An introduction to international organizations law. Cambridge University Press.
Kristiningrum, E. (2011). Kesiapan SNI Kayu dan Produk Kayu dalam Mengantisipasi Kerjasama Regional dan Bilateral. Journal of Industrial Research (Jurnal Riset Industri), 5(3), 249-255.
Kusumaatmadja, M., & Agoes, E. R. (2003). Pengantar hukum internasional. Pusat Studi Wawasan Nusantara, Hukum dan Pembangunan bekerjasama dengan Penerbut PT Alumni.
Marzuki, P. M. (2007). Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Pertama, Cetakan ke-3. Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Ningsih, S.S. (2006). Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional, Ui-Press, Jakarta, 2006, p.229
Purwanto, H. (2011). Keberadaan Asas Rebus Sic Stantibus dalam Perjanjian Internasional. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 102-121.
Puspita, N. Y. (2015). Kewenangan Hukum ASEAN dalam Membuat Perjanjian Internasional dengan Pihak Eksternal Berdasarkan Piagam ASEAN. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 4(3), 719-745.
Siahaan, C. E., Arif, A., & Purba, D. (2013). Peran Uni Eropa dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Bagi Negara Anggota dan Negara Non Anggota. Sumatra Journal of International Law, 1(3), 14986.
Simmons, B. A., & Martin, L. L. (2002). International organizations and institutions. Handbook of international relations, 192-211.
Syah, D. (1984). Mengenal ASEAN dan negara-negara anggotanya: pengetahuan umum untuk pelajar, siswa dan umum. Kreasi Jaya Utama.
Wijayanti, A., & Achmad, L. S. (2011). Strategi penulisan hukum. Lubuk Agung, Bandung.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i4.1598
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.