Wajo Regency Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budgeting Process in The Perspective of The Collaborative Governance Model

Syamsul Bahri, Rakhmat Rakhmat, Muhammad Yunus, Atta Irene Allorante

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to analyze the process of preparing the Wajo district income and expenditure budget from the perspective of a collaborative governance model. This study uses qualitative data in the form of statements consisting of primary data and secondary data. In this study, researchers will use several types of data collection techniques, including observation, in-depth interviews, and document searches. The results showed the Wajo District APBD (Regional Revenue and Expenditures Budget)  budgeting process for the 2020 budget year did not fully meet the collaborative governance dimensions of the collaborative governance process, it could be measured and demonstrated based on the face to face dialogue aspect, not involving stakeholders in a participatory manner, both internally and externally. Trust building aspects, there is mistrust among stakeholders, and mistrust of the community in the process of preparing the APBD. The commitment to the process aspect of the Wajo district budget formulation for the 2020 budget year is not committed to a number of process agreements. The shared understanding aspect is that there are differences in understanding between the local government, the DPRD (Regional People's Representative Assembly) and the community in the preparation of the 2020 APBD and the short-term outcome aspect that decision making is no consensus on the results and agreement in the process.


Keywords


Budgeting; Local Revenue and Expenditure; Collaborative Governance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations Working Together. Sage publications, New York.

Amir, A. (2020). Public Policy Implementation: Study on Educational Budgeting of Palopo. Journal La Sociale, 1(1), 5-11.

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571.

Bentrup, G. (2001). Evaluation of a collaborative model: a case study analysis of watershed planning in theIntermountain West. Environmental management, 27(5), 739-748.

Bittner, E. A. C., & Leimeister, J. M. (2013, January). Why shared understanding matters--Engineering a collaboration process for shared understanding to improve collaboration effectiveness in heterogeneous teams. In 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 106-114). IEEE.

Devas, N., & Binder, B. (1989). Financing local government in Indonesia (Vol. 84). Ohio University Press.

Dwiyanto, A. (2010). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada.

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust-The social virtues and the creation of prosperity, New York: Simon and Schuster.

Gilliam, A., Davis, D., Barrington, T., Lacson, R., Uhl, G., & Phoenix, U. (2002). The value of engaging stakeholders in planning and implementing evaluations. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14(3 Supplement), 5-17.

Karlsen, J. T., Græe, K., & Massaoud, M. J. (2008). Building trust in project‐stakeholder relationships. Baltic journal of management, 3(1).

Lander, M. C., Purvis, R. L., McCray, G. E., & Leigh, W. (2004). Trust-building mechanisms utilized in outsourced IS development projects: a case study. Information & Management, 41(4), 509-528.

Lasker, R. D., & Weiss, E. S. (2003). Broadening participation in community problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. Journal of Urban Health, 80(1), 14-47.

Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(2), 273.

Misztal, B. (1996). Trust in modern societies: The search for the bases of social order. John Wiley & Sons.

Schneider, M., Scholz, J., Lubell, M., Mindruta, D., & Edwardsen, M. (2003). Building consensual institutions: networks and the National Estuary Program. American journal of political science, 47(1), 143-158.

Warner, J. F. (2006). More sustainable participation? Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated catchment management. Water resources development, 22(1), 15-35.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i4.1562

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.