Accountability of General Election Commission of Klaten Regency in Organizing the 2015 Election of Regent and Deputy Regent

Ika Nurmalina Dewi, Rina Herlina Haryanti, Desiderius Sudibyo

Abstract


General Election Commission is an election organizing institution as referred to in the Law governing election administrators who are given the task and authority in administering an election based on the provisions stipulated in the Law. Managerial accountability is expected to be able to encourage the creation of public trust in government performance. Therefore, a review of managerial accountability in public organizations is very important to be carried out in order to ensure that the values of public services are carried out clearly on the managerial performance of the organization. This study will employ a qualitative descriptive approach to gain an in-depth understanding of managerial accountability of General Election Commission of Klaten Regency in organizing the 2015 election of Regent and Deputy Regent of Klaten. The data was obtained from sources related to the research object. In this case, it is the document of the election results of regional head from General Election Commission of Klaten Regency. Collecting the informants was carried out by using purposive sampling technique by selecting who the subjects are in the best position to provide information needed by researchers. In this case, General Election Commission of Klaten Regency carried out 3 stages in managerial accountability consisting of information, action and answer, although there are still a number of activities that are not yet optimal. Society participation and stakeholders have contributed to the success of the election implementation at each stage.


Keywords


General Election Commission; Election of Regional Heads; Managerial Accountability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, M. (2015). Governance and Good Governance: A Conceptual Perspective. The Dialogue, 10 (1). Di akses pada 1 Nopember 2017, dari http://www. qurtuba.edu.pk/thedialogue/dialogue10_1.htm.

Checkland, K., Allen, P., Coleman, A., Segar, J., McDermott, I., Harrison, S., ... & Peckham, S. (2013). Accountable to whom, for what? An exploration of the early development of Clinical Commissioning Groups in the English NHS. BMJ open, 3(12), e003769.

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2015). Performance and accountability—A theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment. Public Organization Review, 15(2), 207-225.

Demirel, D. (2014). Accountability and the Changing Function of the Control. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12 (24).

Dwiyanto, A. (2012). Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Kumorotomo, W. (2005). Akuntabilitas Birokrasi Publik: Sketsa pada Masa Transisi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Mahmudi, B., & Nurhayati, E. (2015). The influence of board governance characteristics on intellectual capital performance (empirical study on listed banks in BEI 2008-2012). Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 4(1), 417.

Mardiasmo, D. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Ole, H.R., Nangoi, G., & Wokas, H.R.N. (2015). Analisis Sistem Pengendalian Intern Dan Pemanfaatan It Governance Terhadap Keandalan Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Minahasa Tenggara Menggunakan Framework Cobit (Control Objectives For Information And Related Technology). Going Concern: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 10 (1). Diakses dari https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/gc/article/ viewFile/7368/6912.

Sedarmayanti. (2013). Reformasi Administrasi Publik, Reformasi Birokrasi, dan Kepemimpinan Masa Depan (Mewujudkan Pelayanan Prima dan Kepemerintahan yang Baik). Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Steets, J. (2010). Accountability in Public Policy Partnership. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan. Di akses pada 17 Desember 2016, dari www.oapen.org/download? type=document&docid=392745.

Trianggoro, D., Larasati, E., & Widowati, N. (2015). Analisis Kinerja Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kota Semarang (Dalam Pemilihan Umum 2014). Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 4(2), 85-95.

Widodo, J. (2001). Good Governance: Telaah Dimensi Akuntabilitas dan Kontrol Birokrasi pada Era Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah. Surabaya: Insan Cendekia.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i1.1370

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.