Juridical Analysis of the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 on Article 29 Law Number 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage

Yusri Yusri, Yaswirman Yaswirman, Neneng Oktarina

Abstract


Indonesia as a legal state, the presence of law in a country aims to guarantee life to protect the interests of citizens. In the Indonesian government system there are several branches of power, namely the legislative, executive and judiciary branches, the judicial power branches are the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court's authority is contained in Article 24 C paragraph (1) and (2) adjudicating at the first and last level whose decision is final to review the Law on the Constitution. Marriage agreement is a form of agreement that regulates assets in marriage and others. A marriage agreement is also an agreement which can affect other regulations. So with the regulation of the marriage agreement in Article 29 paragraph (1) prior to the lawsuit for judicial review to the Constitutional Court stating that the marriage agreement was made at the time, and before the marriage took place, this is what prevents many married couples from different citizens who previously were not have a marriage agreement while their interests require a marriage agreement. The decision analysis can be concluded that the Urgency of the marriage agreement in its decision No.69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 states that the importance of the marriage agreement is related to the position of shared property so that there is a separation of husband's assets with the wife's assets both regarding their respective belongings and the assets that belong to each other obtained during the marriage known as joint property. Whereas the assets obtained before their marriage period together are known as inheritance or personal property obtained after the marriage period which is usually referred to as acquisition assets. Due to the legal marriage agreement before MK Decision Number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015, Indonesian citizens who carry out marriages mixed and does not make a marriage agreement, the Indonesian citizen may not have immovable property in the form of ownership or building rights.


Keywords


Marriage Agreement; Joint Assets; Decision Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Books

Abdul Rasyid Thalib, 2006, Wewenang Mahkamah Konsitusi dan Impilkasinya dalam Sistim Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung.

Achmad Ali. 2002, Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis), Jakarta:Toko Gunung Agung.

Ahmad Rofiq, 1997, “Hukum Islam Di Indonesia”, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Agus Susanto, 2012, Hukum, Moral dan Keadilan Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Ali Afandi, 1997, “Hukum Waris, Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Pembuktian”,Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Suryono Sukanto & Sri Mamuji, 2012, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, cet. empat balas, Jakarta: PT. Raja GrafindoPersada.

Surayin, 2001, Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Analisis, Yrama Widya, Bandung,.

Tutik Triwulan, 2010. Konstruksi Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. Kencana: Jakarta.

Titik Triwulan, 2011, Hukum Perdata Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional, Kencana Prenada Media Grup, Jakarta.

Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 1974, Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia, Sumur Bandung, Bandung.

Wirjono Projodikoro, 1981, Hukum Perdata Tentang Persetujuan-Persetujuan Tertentu, Bandung: Sumur.

Zainal Arifin Hoesein. 2009. Judical Review di Mahkamah Agung RI, Tiga Dekade Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undang. Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.

B. Legislation

KUHPer (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata)

Consideration of judicial review of the constitutional court material on the MK Decision Number: 46/PUU-XIII/2015

Putusan Mahkamah Konsitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Tentang Perjanjian Perkawinan

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Bab I, Pasal 1 Ayat (3)

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria

C. Website and Blog

Avivsyuda. 2012. Mahkamah Konstitusi. Di Akses dari: http://avivsyuhada.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/mahkamah-konstitusi/. [30 Agustus 2013]

Sriono, Perjanjian Kawin Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Terhadap Harta Kekayaan Dalam Perkawinan, Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, Volume 4 Nomor 2, September 2016

Dwika, “Keadilan dari Dimensi Sistem Hukum”, (02/04/2011), diakses pada 24 Juli 2017.

Informasi Media, Pengertian Definisi Analisis, diakses dari: http//media informasil.com/2012/04/pengertian-definisi-analisis.htm,padatanggal 17 Agustus 2017,pukul 17.00 WIB

Jimly Asshiddiqie, www.jimly.com/makalah/HAK_KONSTITUSIONAL PEREMPUAN.doc, downloaded 09 April 2017.

Jurnal dunia-ibu.org online, Perjanjian Pranikah, copyright 2001-2002 dalam http://www.duniaibu.org/ html/ perjanjian_pra_nikah.html), diaksespada 2 April 2018.

Nabila Afinannisa, 27 Desember 2012, Penegak hukum, Kesadaran Hukum, dan Pelaksanaan Hukum(online),http://vinabilla.blogsport.com/2012/12penegakan-hukum-kesadaran-hukum-dan.html, diakses21 juli 2017

Rina Anggraini, tanpa tahun, “Pernikahan Agama Hindu”, URL http://www.academia.edu/6498041/Pernikahan-Agama-Hindu, diakses 22 Juli 2017

Sulistianing Astuti.2010. Popularitas dan Eksistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi. Di aksesdari:http://lingkarstudihukumperkembangansosial.blogspot.com/2008/11/popularitas-dan eksistensi-mahkamah.html. [1 September 2017].

www.lindungikami.org/.../UU_Nomor_39_tentang_Hak_Asasi_Manusia.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i5.1162

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.