The Effectiveness of Diabetic Gymnastic Program Evaluation in Imron Medika Primary Clinic Using CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product)

Abstract

Diabetes Gymnastic program is a system organized by a clinic in implementing Social Insurance Administration Organization for Health (thereafter called BPJS Kesehatan) and proactive approach conducted in integrated manner by involving patients developing some diseases, one of which is type-2 diabetes mellitus, to achieve the optimum quality of life with efficient and effective healthcare service.

CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation consisted of Context, a basis of evaluation aiming to provide reasons in setting out the objective. Input is an evaluation aiming to provide information to determine how to use thee available components including human resource, infrastructure, cost, and procedure. Process is an implementation of activity planned in the field and Product is to measure the success and to interpret the achievement of program’s objective specified.  

This research aimed to find out and to describe the background of program creation, program benefit, program development procedure, patient admission, infrastructure feasibility, costing/funding, implementation, monitoring, progress and output of diabetes gymnastic program in Imron Medika Primary Clinic.

The study was evaluative qualitative research using descriptive method with CIPP model. This research attempted to describe the reality existing concerning a condition found objectively. Basically this study discussed the concept of diabetes gymnastic program implemented in Imron Medika Primary Clinic. Techniques of collecting data used in this study were interview, observation, questionnaire and documentation. The procedure taken in analyzing the data of research included: (1) data collection, (2) data reduction, (3) data display, and (4) conclusion drawing/verification. Data validation was carried out using source triangulation technique. Sampling technique employed was purposive sampling one.

From the result of research, it can be seen that all aspects have been implemented well, but there is still some problem in input aspect related to the program development procedure not consistent with the specified one. In addition, there is still a debate in input aspect due to different ratings from the data sources leading to less comfort to some certain parties. What is still doubted in process aspect is the program progress that could not have been assessed entirely because the program is still too premature to be assessed from health point of view.