Implementation of Inclusion Education Program in the Junior High School 4 at Praya

Nida Smith, A. Hari Witono, Fahruddin Fahruddin


This study aims to determine the management model and identify obstacles in the implementation of inclusive education programs at Junior High School 4 in Praya. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with a case study method (casy study). Data collection techniques are carried out using in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document studies. Sources of research data are principals, deputy principals, special escort teachers and counseling teachers. Furthermore, data analysis is carried out through the steps of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results of the research found in Junior High School 4 at Praya relating to the management of inclusive education there were 18 special needs students who had various abnormalities and obstacles, namely; 13 students were slow to learn, 1 low vision person, 1 mentally retarded person, 1 hearing impaired and 1 person had communication disorders. These problems often experience obstacles in the management of curriculum modification, between the curriculum of regular students with special needs students (PDBK), there is only 1 special assistant teacher who serves special needs students, lack of facilities and infrastructure that support the implementation of inclusive education programs in Junior High School 4 at Praya. The model of inclusive education applied in Junior High School 4 at Praya is a regular class model with full out, namely students with special needs learning with other children (normal) in the regular class and developing their talents and interests by special tutors so that students can develop optimally according to skills possessed.


Implementation; Inclusive Education Program

Full Text:



Alquraini, T. A. (2012). Factors Related to Teachers’ Attitudes Towards the Inclusive Education of Students with Severe Intellectual Disabilities in Riyadh, Saudi. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(3), 170-182.

Khochen, M., & Radford, J. (2012). Attitudes of Teachers and Headteachers Towards Inclusion in Lebanon. International Journal ofInclusive Education, 16(2), 139–153.

Kustawan, Dedy. (2012). Pendidikan Inklusif dan Implementasinya. Jakarta:

Loiacono,V., & Valenti, V. (2010). General Education Teachers Need to Be Prepared to Co Teach the Increasing Number of Children with Autismin Inclusive Settings. International Journalof Special Education, 25(3), hlm.24-32.

Marthan, L. K. (2007). Manajemen Pendidikan Inklusif. Jakarta: DIRJEN DIKTI.

Moleong, L.J. (2006). Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mudjito, dkk.(2012). Pendidikan Inklusif. Editor: Wardi. Jakarta: Baduose Media

Savolainen, H., Engelbrechtb, P., Nelc, M., & Malinena, O. (2012). Understanding Teachers’ Attitudes and Self-Efficacy in Inclusive Education: Implications for Pre-Service and In-Service Teacher. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27(1), 51-68.

Sugiyono.(2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Tarmansyah. (2007). Inklusi Pendidikan Untuk Semua. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Vaz, S., Wilson, N., Falkmer, M., Sim, A., Scott, M., Cordler, R., & Falkmer, T. (2015). Factors Associated with Primary School Teachers' Attitudes Toward the Inclusion of Students with Disabilities. Inclusion of Students withDisabilities in School, 1-12



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.