Grosse Executorial Strength What Is Recognition of Debt in Practice (Study in Class 1A of Mataram District Court)

Ikang Satrya Medyantara, Lalu Husni, Sudiarto Sudiarto

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to analyze the strength of executorial Grosse Debt Recognition Deed in practice in the Class 1A of Mataram District Court. The research method used is empirical normative research. First, based on the results of the research that the Strength of Grosse's Debt Recognition Act in Debt Payment Implementation has a strength that is undoubtedly very strong because it can immediately be submitted for execution without going through a lawsuit in court, which is due to an executive power in the Grosse deed the acknowledgment of Debt in the head of the Deed is that there is an order for justice based on the One and only God made by the Second Notary, Grosse deed of debt recognition can be carried out directly without going through a claim process in court, bearing in mind the Grosse deed of debt recognition provided the head of the office reads for the sake of justice based on the supreme divinity, so that with the power contained in the debt recognition deed, direct execution can be carried out by the creditor to the court if the debtor defaults, without going through the claim process in court. Third, there are several relationships in the execution of Grosse's deed. Debt recognition, for example, the community's knowledge of the gross debt recognition deed. The second, sometimes the notary in making debt recognition Grosse statements does not pay attention to material and formal requirements from the Grosse deed itself.


Keywords


Executive Power; Grosse Debt Recognition Deed; In Practice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Fikri, A., A. & Tanzah, E. 2010. Penjelasan Hukum Tentang Grosse Akta. Nasional legal Reform Program: Jakarta.

HIR (Herzien Inlandsch Reglement) dan RBG (Reglement Tot Regeling Van Het Rechtswezen In De Gewesten Buiten Java En Madura)

Husni, L. 2010. Hukum KetenagaKerjaan Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.

Juhaya, P. S. 2011. Teori Hukum dan Aplikasinya. CV Pustaka Setia: Bandung.

Juhaya, S., P. 2011.Teori Hukum dan Aplikasinya, Pustaka Setia Bandung.

Muhammad, K., A. 2002. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia, Cetakan Kedua Revisi. Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung.

Mukti F. N.D. & Yulianto A. 2010. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta

Supramono, G. 2013. Perjanjian utang piutang. Kencana Media Group: Jakarta

Supramono, G. 2013. Perjanjian utang piutang. Kencana Media Group: Jakarta

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik IndonesiaTahun 1945.

Undang-Undang No. 2 tahun 2014 perubahan Undang-Undang No. 30 tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 3), Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5491.

Undang-Undang No. 30 tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 117), Tambahan Lembaran Negara republik Indonesia Nomor 4432.

Undang-Undang No. 4 tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tangguhan Atas Tanah beserta benda-benda yang berkaitan dengan tanah ( Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1996 Nomor 42), Tambahan lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3632.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perbankan.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i3.886

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
[email protected]
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.