Juridical Analysis of Partner Liabilities in Bankruptcy Process at CV Agro Sawita Mandiri Perkasa

Prima Dona, Zainul Daulay, Ulfanora Ulfanora

Abstract


According to the juridical analysis of partner liabilities in bankruptcy process at CV Agro Sawita Mandiri Perkasa, the Director of CV Agro Sawita Mandiri Perkasa had postponed the payment of debts that have been due. It aimed to determine the judge’s consideration in making bankruptcy decisions and partner liabilities. This paper applies a normative juridical writing method. In addition, it draws the conclusion that the commercial court had obtained facts or circumstances which were simply proven that the requirement to declare bankruptcy, as stipulated in Article 2 paragraph (1) of the UUK-PKPU, had been fulfilled. Therefore, related to Article 8 paragraph (4), the judge must grant the bankruptcy petition. Partner liabilities, in the case of bankruptcy, mean that unlimited partner is liable for receivables to personal assets. An unlimited partner, who invests capital in partnership and involves personal property, is included the act of making an agreement. Moreover, if the limited partner participates in an agreement and action that can be equated with the unlimited partner, as what is stipulated in Article 21 of KUHD, the limited partner must also be liable to personally bear all CV debts in solidarity.


Keywords


Bankruptcy Petition; Consideration of th e Judge; Judge’s Decision

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books

Widjaya, I. G. (2005). Rai, Hukum Perusahaan (Undang-Undang dan Peraturan Pelaksana Undang-Undang di Bidang Usaha).

Soekardono, R. (1991). Hukum Dagang Indonesia Jilid II. Jakarta: Rajawali,

Sembiring, S. (2004). Hukum Dagang. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Purwosutjipto, H. M. N. (2005). Pengertian Pokok Hukull1 Dagang Indonesia 2: Bentuk-Bentuk Perusahaan. Jakarta: Djall1batan.

Amiruddin, H., & Zainal Asikin, 2012, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan ke-6, Edisi Pertama, Penerbit: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Fuady, M. (2005). Profesi mulia: etika profesi hukum bagi hakim, jaksa, advokat, notaris, kurator, dan pengurus. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sutantya, R. T., Hadhikusuma, R. & Sumantoro. (1991). Pengertian Pokok Hukum Perusahaan Bentuk-Bentuk Perusahaan yang Berlaku di Indonesia.

Juwana, H. (2005). Politik Hukum UU Bidang Ekonomi di Indonesia.

Khairandy, R. (2013). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia. FH UII Press.

Journal

Gerungan, A. E. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Rahasia Dagang Ditinjau dari Aspek Hukum Perdata dan Pidana di Indonesia oleh: Anastasia E. Gerungan. Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, 22(5).

Emirzon, J. (2006). Regulatory Driven Dalam Implementasi Prinsip-Prinsip Good Corporate Governance Pada Perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis Sriwijaya, 4(8), 93-114.

Budianto, A. (2013). Pembaharuan Kitab Hukum Dagang Indonesia: Antara Kodifikasi, Kompilasi dan Konsolidasi. -, 47(2).

Legislation

Indonesia (KUHD), Commercial Law, Article 21, State Gazette of 1938 No. 276.

Decision No.07/Pdt.Pailit/2015/PN.Mdn Tahun 2015 on behalf of Muhammad Yakub.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i3.771

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
[email protected]
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.