Determination of the Name Change of the South China Sea Becoming the North Natuna Sea Reviewed from United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982
Abstract
This study analyzes the determination of the change of the name of the South China Sea to the North Natuna Sea from the perspective of international law, especially based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982. The main focus is on how the regulation of maritime areas under UNCLOS 1982 and the Indonesian government's actions in defending sovereignty in the North Natuna Sea face China's unilateral claims. This analysis confirms that Indonesia's determination to rename the South China Sea to the North Natuna Sea is based on recognized international law, especially the 1982 UNCLOS. China's unilateral claims, including the Nine-Dash Line and traditional fishing grounds, are not recognized under the 1982 UNCLOS and are considered a violation of Indonesia's sovereign rights. Indonesia has taken concrete steps to defend its sovereignty, including registering the name change with the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) and keeping it at the United Nations Headquarters, ensuring international recognition of Indonesia's claims. In addition, Indonesia has increased its defense capabilities in the Natuna region through military build-ups, including building military bases and conducting patrols, and has engaged in diplomatic efforts. These comprehensive measures demonstrate Indonesia's commitment to upholding international law and protecting its national interests from external claims.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
United Nations. Statute of the International Court of Justice.
________. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982.
Indonesia. Law on Indonesia's Exclusive Economic Zone. Law Number 5 of 1983. LN No. 44 of 1983. TLN No. 3260.
________. Law on Indonesian Waters. Law Number 6 of 1996. LN No. 73 of 1996. TLN no. 3647.
________. Law on the Indonesian National Army. Law Number 34 of 2004. LN No.127 of 2004. TLN No. 4439.
________. Law on State Territories. Law Number 43 of 2008 LN. No. 177 of 2008. TLN No. 4925.
________. Law on the Management of National Resources for National Defense. Law Number 23 of 2019. LN. No. 211 of 2019. TLN. No. 6413.
________. Government Regulation on the Rights and Obligations of Foreign Ships and Aircraft in Exercising the Rights of Archipelagic Sea Channels through the Indonesian Archipelago Sea Channels. Government Regulation No. 37 of 2002. LN No. 71 of 2002. TLN No. 4210.
________. Government Regulation on National Spatial Planning. Government Regulation Number 47 of 1997. LN. No. 96 of 1997. TLN. No. 3721.
________.Decree of the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia on Estimated Potential, Number of Allowable Catches, and Utilization Levels of Fish Resources in the State Fisheries Management Area of the Republic of Indonesia. Kepmen-KKP Number 47/KEPMEN-KP/2016.
Sefriani. The Role of International Law in Contemporary Relations. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2016.
Asa Septari B., Nuans et al. "Indonesia's Response to Threats in the North Natuna Sea During the Leadership of President Joko Widodo". Journal of Lemhannas RI, published by the National Resilience Institute of the Republic of Indonesia. Vol. 10 No. 1 of 2022.
Satria Maulana, Yovindra et. al. "The Change of the Name of Indonesia's Exclusive Economic Zone in the South China Sea to the North Natuna Sea (1982-2017)". Nusantara Hasana Journal. Published by Yayasan Nusantara Hasana Berdikari. Vol. 3 No. 2 of 2023.
Sambogo, Alief. "The Naming of the North Natuna Sea by the Government of Indonesia in the Perspective of International Law". Jurist-Diction. published by Universitas Airlangga. Vol. 1 No. 2 of 2018.
Tulak Andi, Emerentiana, et. al. "Conflict Against China's Claim to Indonesia's Exclusive Economic Zone in the North Natuna Sea". Journal of Thought and Research in the Social Sciences, Law & Teaching. Published by UNM Journal. Vol. 19 No. 1 of 2024.
Rahmat Maulana, Febriyansyah and Rahayu Repindowaty. "Analysis of the Permanent Court of Arbitration Decision on the Nine Dash Line Claim: A Case Study of the North Natuna Region Claim". Journal of International Law. published by Journal Unja. Vol. 1 No. 2 of 2020.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v13i2.7403
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.

















