Law Enforcement in Impositioning Imprisonment towards Gambling Crime Offender (Case Study of Decision Number: 24/PID.B/ 2012/PN.PP)

Abstract

The implementation of Article 303 subsection (1) of Criminal Code empirically has been conducted in the decision Number 24/PID.B/2012/PN.PP. The defendant named Giman called as Dolok, aged 60 years old, an enterpreneur, adressed in Pemuda Street Number 33 RT 01 Subdistrict of Koto Panjang, Padang Panjang City. There are some differences between criminal regulations in Article 303 subsection (1) of Criminal Code which is the imprisonment for 10 years with verdict of imprisonment for 3 months and 15 days.  The objective of this research is to know how the law enforcement in impositioning imprisonment towards gambling crime offender in the Decision Number: 24/PID.B/ 2012/PN.PP? by using normative judicial approach. The present research is descriptive. The legal material analysis is done by using qualitative analysis method. The conclusion of this research: 1) The law enforcement in the Decision Number: 24/PID.B/ 2012/PN.PP has been achieved by implementing the regulation of Article 303 subsection (1) of Criminal Code. The article regulation is implemented in the gambling crime offender. The law enforcement towards the gambling crime offender is done by judge with Verdict Number: 24/PID.B/ 2012/PN.PP, the judge has imprisoned the doer by the way which has been set in the constitution. The law enforcement with law enforcement phases is the effort to guarantee that decision Number: 24/PID.B/ 2012/PN.PP has legal certainty.