Termination of Prosecution as a Manifestation of Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia

Ilhamd Wahyudi, Nikmah Rosidah, Elwi Danil

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the termination of prosecution carried out by prosecutors against perpetrators and victims of criminal acts who have agreed to make peace as a manifestation of restorative justice. In fact, currently the termination of prosecution has limitations that are locked with minimal sanction provisions, so that the termination of prosecution is not implemented optimally each year. In principle, the termination of prosecution can be carried out by the Prosecutor's Office through the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning the Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice, but in the Regulation there are limits to sanctions, namely the threat of a sentence of less than 5 years and a fine of 2.5 million and even though they already have a peace letter if these provisions are not met, the termination of prosecution cannot be implemented. In implementing these provisions both in the Criminal Procedure Code, related laws and the Regulation, an approach can be taken that provides a solution, namely through the Safeguard System approach to better protect the rights of victims and perpetrators of criminal acts based on the intention of the parties to make peace in assisting law enforcement in Indonesia. The Safeguard System is an effort to improve restorative justice which was originally only limited by the provisions of threats under 5 years and losses under 2.5 million, however, through this approach, even if the threat is above the provisions but peace has been reached, the case can be stopped.

Keywords


Termination of Prosecution, Restorative Justice, Criminal Justice System.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hanafi Arief, et al., “Implementation of Restorative Justice Principles in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia”, Al’Adl Journal, Volume X Number 2, July 2018, p. 1.

Marsall B Clinard and Peter C. Yeager, Corporate Crime, New York: The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co.Inc, 1980: 22-23

Muladi, Theoretical and Conceptual Identification of Corporate Criminal Liability and Criminal Policies to Overcome It, Semarang, Corporate Crime Lecture Materials, Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Semarang University.

Pangestika Rizki Utami, the diversion process is all parties involved in a particular crime together to overcome the problem and create an obligation to make things better by involving victims, children, the community and related parties to find the best solution for children without any element of retaliation. In the Volksgeit Journal, Vol. 1 No. 1 June 2018, pp. 95-106.

Rena Yulia. "The Position of Victims in the Criminal Justice System (A Study of the Position of Victims in the Criminal Procedure Code and the Law on Witness and Victim Protection" in the Yustisia Journal. Surakarta, 2009 Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University 2010. Victimology of Legal Protection for Victims of Crime, pp. 164-190

Rick Sarre, Restorative Justice: A Paradigm of Possibility, in Martin D. Schwart and Suzanne E. Hatty, eds, Controversies in Critical Criminology, 2003, pp. 97-103

Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutahuruk, Overcoming Corporate Crime Through a Restorative Approach, a Legal Breakthrough, Sinar Grafika, 2013, p. 195

Septa Chandra, (2014). Legal Politics of Adopting Restorative Justice in Criminal Law Reform, Fiat Justisia Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 8 (No. 2), pp. 255-277.

Sudarto, Criminal Law and Community Development, Bandung, Alumni, 1983, p. 35

Ulang Mangun Sosiawan et al., Perspective of restorative justice as a form of protection for children in conflict with the law, DE JURE Legal Research Journal, ISSN 1410-5632 Vol. 16 No. 4, December 2016: 425-438

Van Ness, legal Issues, http://www.restorativejustice.org, in Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk, Handling Corporate Crime Through a Restorative Approach, a Legal Breakthrough, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2013, p. 141-146

Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Legal Protection for Victims of Crime in Indonesia, in his book Andi Sofyan and Abdul Asis, on Victims' Rights in Court, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012, p. 25




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v12i7.6969

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.