Unilateral Termination in Law and Practice
Abstract
Unilateral termination in law and practice refers to the termination or cancellation of an agreement or contract by one party without the consent of the other party. This phenomenon often occurs in various contexts, both in business contractual relationships and personal relationships, such as rental agreements or employment contracts. Legally, unilateral termination is generally regulated to ensure legal certainty and protection of the rights of the parties involved. In law, unilateral termination can occur if one party materially breaches the terms of the agreement. These terms can include financial obligations, performance, or other agreed terms. Contract law usually provides an opportunity for the injured party to file a lawsuit or claim for damages. However, this process often involves legal complexities that require proof of violation and bad faith or negligence on the part of the party terminating the contract. In practice, unilateral termination often has significant impacts, such as financial losses, reputational damage, and social impacts on the affected party. Therefore, many contracts include dispute resolution clauses to deal with issues arising from unilateral termination. This can be in the form of mediation, arbitration, or court. The existence of this clause aims to minimize conflict and ensure a fair resolution mechanism for all parties. Overall, although unilateral termination is common in legal practice, it is important to thoroughly understand the applicable legal provisions and the implications of such action in order to protect the rights and interests of all parties involved.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aris Yudhariansyah, Aris (2024). Legal Analysis of Criminal Liability of Health Workers Due to Medical Malpractice from The Perspective of Law Number 36 of 2009 Concerning Health (Study of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2033 K/Pid. Sus/2017) (Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Law, Islamic University of North Sumatra).
Elizar, C., Markoni, M., Kantikha, IM, & Saragih, S. (2024). Legal Protection for Doctors Suspected of Malpractice Reviewed from the Applicable Laws and Regulations (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 233 K/Pid. Sus/2021). ALADALAH: Journal of Politics, Social, Law and Humanities, 2(2), 168.
Ismail, N., & Mujib, A. (2023). Position of Al-Hisbah Territory in Court Decision Number: 1083/Pdt. G/2023/Pa. Btl Regarding Rahn and Ijarah Disputes. QISTHOSIA: Journal of Sharia and Law, 4 (2), 141-151.
Kurniawan, MI (2021). Application of the principle of equality before the law in criminal justice practices (study of Bandung District Court Decision Number: 221/Pid. B/2019/PN. Bdg). Journal of Criminal Law Studies, 1, 29-36.
Putri, NBP (2024). Default in Land Sale and Purchase Underhand Resulting in the Name Change Process (Study of Decision Number 347/Pdt. G/2022/PN SBY). Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10 (10), 593-607.
Sutrisno, S., Puluhulawa, F., & Tijow, LM (2020). Application of the Principles of Justice, Legal Certainty and Benefit in Judges' Decisions on Corruption Crimes. Gorontalo Law Review, 3 (2), 168-187.
Taqiuddin, HU, & Risdiana, R. (2022). Implementation of Restorative Justice in State Administration Practice. JISIP (Journal of Social Sciences and Education), 6 (1).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v12i2.6628
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.