Arrangement and Implementation of Notary Privileges after the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 49/PUQU-X/2012

Marthalena Refningsih, Zainul Daulay, Jean Elvardi

Abstract


The formulation of the research problems includes: 1) How is the notary privilege arrangement before and after the decision of Constitutional Court number 49/PUU-X/2012? 2) How is the notary privilege implementation after the decision of Constitutional Court number 49/PUU-X/2012?

The main approach method used in this research is a normative juridical approach; i.e. research that emphasizes legal aspects, by studying the primary and secondary legal materials which will later be used as guidelines in understanding and analyzing the issues under discussion. In addition, the main approach is supported by an empirical juridical approach.

Discussion: 1) since the ratification of Law number 30 of 2004, notary privileges are regulated in Article 4, Article 16, Article 54 and Article 66 paragraph (1), following the decision of Constitutional Court number 49/PUU-X/2012 which grants the petition for judicial review of Article 66 paragraph (1). 2) After the establishment of the decision of Constitutional Court number 49/PUU-X/2012 related to the cancellation of the approval term of the Regional Supervisory Board in Article 66 paragraph (1) of the Law of Notary Position, there is no protection against privileges because investigators, public prosecutors and judges can call and take the copy of the original of the deed and documents in the storage directly without the approval of the Regional Supervisory Board.


Keywords


Notary; Privilege; Deed

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adjie, H. (2008). Hukum Notaris Indonesia (Tafsir Tematik terhadap UU No.30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris), cetakan pertama. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Sjaifurrachman & Adjie, H. (2011). Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Salim, H.S. & Nurbaini, E. S. (2013). Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis Dan Desertasi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Supriadi. (2006). Etika Dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI No. 7 tahun 2016 tentang Majelis Kehormatan Notaris.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor : 49/PUU-X/2012.

Syofyan, S. Notaris-PPAT-Pejabat Lelang di Jakarta Selatan, Majelis Pengawas Daerah, Dosen Lemhannas RI, Magister Kenotariatan, Pasca/S2 Hukum, Bareskrim Mabes Polri, Mabes TNI, Kemhan, Diklat Perbankan, Saksi Ahli, http://www.indonesianotarycommunity.com/perlindungan-hukum-terhadap-profesi-notaris/.

Budiyanto, Y. (2012). Kewajiban Ingkar Notaris. (Online). Diakses dari http://yoanbudiyanto.blogspot.co.id/2012/07/kewajiban-ingkar-notaris.html.

Arizona, Y. (2008). Apa Itu Kepastian Hukum, lihat dalam: Apa Itu Kepastian Hukum?. (Online). Diakses dari http://yancearizona.net/2008/04/13/apa-itu-kepastian-hukum/.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i2.661

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
[email protected]
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.