An Ideological Critique Towards the Representation of Power in The Novel Teruslah Bodoh Jangan Pintar by Tere Liye
Abstract
In some cases, literary works can be a means to depict social and political life that is unjust and undemocratic. Ideological criticism in literature is an analytical approach that focuses on how ideologies, or dominant systems of thought and values, are represented and critiqued in literary works, particularly to explain a specific representation of power that can be used as a learning tool. This study aims to analyze the representation of power in novels using a qualitative descriptive method and the theory of hegemonic power. Data was collected through a reading and note-taking technique, as well as by comparing data from the novel with data from references. The analysis reveals that the representation of power in novels consists of three forms: authority, legitimacy, and the nature of power. Authority is used to depict how power influences the lives of society, legitimacy is used to depict how power influences the lives of society in a legitimate manner, and the nature of power is used to depict how power influences the lives of society in an illegitimate manner. The representation of power in novels shows that power can take the form of authority, legitimacy, or the nature of power, which influences the lives of society.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Chandra, Ardila. 2015. Skripsi: “Formasi Ideologi dan Negosiasi dalam Novel Burung Burung Rantau karya Y. B. Mangunwijaya: Analisis Hegemoni Gramsci”. Jurusan: Sastra Indonesia. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Eagleton, T. (1976). Marxism and Literary Criticism. Methuen.
Farlina, N. (2016). Representasi Kekerasan Simbolik terhadap Perempuan Betawi dalam Novel Kronik Betawi Karya Ratih Kumala. DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia , Vol 3 (1), Hlm. 52.
Fashri, F. (2014). Pierre Bourdieu Menyingkap Kuasa Simbol. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. Pantheon Books.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Habermas, J. (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.
Haryatmoko. (2016). Critical Discourse Analysis Analisis Wacana Kritis Landasan Teori Metodologi Dan Penerapan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Hendrarti, H. (2008). Aneka Sifat Kekerasan: Fisik, Simbolik, Birokratik, dan Struktural. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Hermawan, S. (2015). Representasi Perempuan dalam Sastra Lisan Lamut. Dalam Que, Stella Rose dan Falantino E. L. (Ed.), Sastra dan Solidaritas Bangsa (hlm. 391). Ambon: HISKI AMBON.
Humaidi, A. (2016). Struktur Teks, Kognisi Sosial, dan Dimensi Sosial Pidato Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. Jurnal Bahasa Sastra dan Pembelajarannya (JBSP), Vol 6 (1), Hlm. 118.
Liye, Tere. (2024). Teruslah Bodoh Jangan Pintar. Depok: PT Sabak Grip Nusantara.
Simon, Roger. 2004. Gagasan-gagasan Politik Gramsci. Terj. Kamdani dan Imam Baehaqi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Wijakangka, Agga Ramses. 2008. Analisis Hegemoni Kekuasaan dalam Novel Pabrik Karya Putu Wijaya. Jurnal Artikulasi Vol. 5 No. 1 Februari 2008. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Wulandari, J. (2018). Representasi Kekuasaan dalam Bahasa Iklan Produk Kecantikan. Jurnal Bahasa Sastra dan Pembelajarannya (JBSP) , Vol 8 (1), Hlm. 79.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v12i3.6594
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.