The Effect of Using the Cycle 5E Learning Model Based on Local Wisdom on the Discipline Attitude and Social Sciences Learning

Baiq Maya Lestari, A. Hari Witono, Edy Herianto, Asrin Asrin, Siti Istiningsih

Abstract


Social Sciences is one of the subjects taught at the elementary school level. One of the goals of Social Sciences education is to develop awareness of the values of citizenship, morals, and state ideology, which can be realized through the development of democratic citizens. This study aims to determine the effect of using the Learning Cycle 5E model based on local wisdom on students' learning outcomes and Social Sciences learning discipline. The research approach used is quantitative research. The type of research conducted The kind of research used is a quasi-experimental type nonrandomized control group pre-test-post-test design. The research design used is to use two class objects, namely one experimental class and one control class. The experimental class was treated using the 5E learning cycle model while the control class was treated with a conventional learning model in the form of a demonstration. The research was carried out at Integrated Islamic Basic Schools of Generasi Muslim Cendikia (GMC) class IVa and class IVb. Class IVa has been used as an experimental class and IVb as a control. The sample in each class IV of GMC is 19 people. The data obtained from the research results were then analyzed using prerequisite tests, namely normality tests and homogeneity tests after being fulfilled, hypothesis testing was carried out with a comparative test between the experimental class and the control class. The results showed that the Learning Cycle 5E learning model based on local wisdom had a positive effect on students' disciplinary attitudes. The application of the learning cycle 5e based on local wisdom had a significant impact on improving student learning outcomes. This can be caused by several factors. The Learning Cycle 5E learning model based on local wisdom also had a significant impact on students' disciplinary attitudes and learning outcomes.

Keywords


Learning Cycle Learning Model; Local Wisdom; Discipline; Learning Outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. 2006. Research Procedures: A Practical Approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Astawan, I. G. and Rati, N. W. 2016. The Influence of Quantum Learning Model and Summarizing Technique on Human Reasoning. E-Journal PGSD Undiksh, Volume 3 (pages 1-9). https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/85726-none-ce3fd1f6.pdf accessed on January 18, 2024.

FKIP. (2020). Guidelines for Writing Scientific Papers.Mataram: FKIP Unram

Hamdi, A. S., & Bahruddin, E. 2014. Quantitative Research Methods Application in Education. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama.

Hermawan, H. 2006. Innovative Learning Models. Bandung: Citra Praya.

Jakni. 2016. Experimental Research Methodology in Education. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Kusumastuti, A., Khoirin, A. M., & Ali, A. T., (2020). Quantitative Research Methods. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Martorella, P. H., (1994). Social Studies for Elementary School Children: Developing Young Citizens. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.

Mulyono, N., (2018). Curriculum and Learning. Bandung: Rizqi Press.

Ngalimun. 2014. Learning Strategies and Models. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.

Octavia, S. A., (2020). Learning Models. Sleman: Deepublish Publisher.

Parmati, D. P., & Rediani, N. N. 2020. Fun Teaching in Elementary Schools. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.

Parwanti. 2020. Cooperative Learning Game Model in Junior High School Social Studies Learning. Indramayu: Adab Publisher.

Purnomo, A., et al. 2018. Designing Social Studies Learning. Semarang: Cipta Prima Nusantara.

Riduwan. 2013. Basics of Statistics. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Riinawati. 2021. Introduction to Educational Evaluation. Yogyakarta: Thema Publishing.

Sapriya. (2015). Social Studies Education. Bandung: Rosdakarya

Sardjiyo, et al. (2014). Social Studies Education in Elementary Schools. Jakarta: Open University Publisher.

Shoimin, Aris. 2014. 68 INNOVATIVE Learning Models in the 2013 Curriculum. Yogyakarta: AR-RUZZ MEDIA.

Shoimin, A. 2016. 68 Innovative Learning Models in the 2013 Curriculum. Yogyakarta: Arus Media.

Siregar, S. 2013. Quantitative Research Methods Completed with Comparison of Manual Calculations & SPSS. Jakarta: Prenamedia Group.

Sudaryono. 2016. Educational Research Methods. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sudijono, A. 2011. Introduction to Educational Evaluation. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sugiyono. 2007. Educational Research Methods Qualitative, Quantitative, and R & D Approaches. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2018. Research Methods (Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D). Bandung:

Suhadi, I., Mukhadis, A., & Dasna, I. W. 2003. Basics of Research Methodology. Malang: State University of Malang.

Sukardi. 2018. Educational Research Methodology Revised Edition. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Supardi. 2013. Application of Statistics in Research Revised Edition. Jakarta: Change Publication.

Trianto. 2010. Integrated Learning Model. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Umar, H. 2002. Research Methodology for Business Thesis and Dissertation. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suryani, A.I., dan Ningsih, S.R. 2021. Aplikasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Jepang Berbasis Android. Journal

Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v12i1.6337

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.