Analysis of Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability in Terms of Multiple Intelligence, Cognitive Style and Learning Style of Junior High School Students
Abstract
This study aims to describe: (1) the mathematical problem-solving ability of Sleman Regency's JHS students, (2) whether there is a difference in students' mathematical problem-solving ability in terms of multiple intelligence, (3) whether there is a difference in students' mathematical problem-solving ability in terms of cognitive style, (4) whether there is a difference in students' mathematical problem-solving ability in terms of learning style, and (5) whether there is an interaction between multiple intelligences, cognitive style and learning style. The research method used is a survey method with a quantitative approach. The research population is JHS students in the 2023/2024 school year in Sleman. The sample is 434 students, determined using a stratified proportional random sampling technique. The instruments used were a mathematical problem-solving ability test, a GEFT test, a multiple intelligence questionnaire, and a learning style questionnaire. The data analysis is descriptive statistics to determine students' mathematical problem-solving ability level and inferential statistics using a three-way ANOVA test to describe students' mathematical problem-solving ability's differences in terms of multiple intelligence, cognitive style and learning style, and to describe the interaction between multiple intelligences, cognitive style and learning style. The analysis showed that: (1) the mathematical problem-solving ability average score of Sleman's JHS students is 53.49 which is in the moderate category, (2) there is no difference in students' mathematical problem-solving ability in terms of multiple intelligence, (3) there is a difference in students' mathematical problem-solving ability in terms of cognitive style, (4) there is no difference in students' mathematical problem-solving ability in terms of learning style, and (5) there is no interaction between multiple intelligence, cognitive style and learning style of students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anthycamurty, R. C., & Saputro, D. R. (2018). Analysis of Problem Solving in Terms of Cognitive Style. Jornal of Physics: Conference Series.
Baharullah, Wahyuddin, Usman, M. R., & Syam, N. (2022). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 1039-1051.
Delgado, A. R., & Prieto, G. (2004). Cognitive Mediators and Sex-Related Diferences in Mathematics. Intelligence, 25-32.
Elisa, E. A. (2017). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA Konten Bilangan Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Majemuk. MATHEdunesa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 67-72.
Fias, W., & Fischer MH. (2005). Spatial representation of numbers. In J. Campbell (Ed.). Handbook of Mathematical Cognition, 43-54.
Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligence go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligence. Educational Researches.
Hobri, Tussolikha, D., & Oktavianingtyas, E. (2020). Pemecahan Masalah dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Jumping Task ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Jurnal Elemen, 183-198.
Ishartono, N., Faiziyah, N., Sutarni, S., & Putri, A. B. (2021). Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic Students: How They Solve PISA-Oriented Mathematics Problems? Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
Kurniawati, I., & Kurniasari, I. (2019). Literasi Matematika Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA pada Konten Space and Shape Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Majemuk. MATHEdunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 441-448.
Lachance JA, & Mazzocco M A. (2006). Llongitudinal analysis of sex diff erences in math and spatial skills in primary school age children. Learn. Ind. Differ., 195-216.
Maula, I., & Fitri, A. (n.d.). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar dan Kecemasan Matematika terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMPN 17 Pekalongan. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika. Surabaya: Publikasi Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat.
NCTM. (2000). Principle and standards for school mathematics. United States of America: The National Council of Theachers of Mathematics, Inc.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Result combined executive summaries. PISA OECD Publishing.
Polya, G. (1973). Hot to Solve It (2nd ed). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Risnawati, A. A., Dwijanto, & Kharisudin, I. (2022). Analisis Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Majemuk. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1151-1165.
Sholihah, S. Z., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2017). Analisis Kesuliatan Siswa dalam Proses Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tahapan Berpikir Van Hiele. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 287-298.
Tisngati, U. (2015). Proses Berpikir Reflektif Mahasiswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah pada Materi Himpunan ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Berdasarkan Langkah Polya. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 115-124.
Utami, R. W., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2017). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika dan self-efficacy siswa SMP negeri di kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika.
witkin. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications.
Yavich, R., & Rotnitsky, I. (2020). Multiple Intelligences and Success in School Studies. International Journal of Higher Education, 107-117.
Zhu Z. Gender. (2007). Diff erences in mathematical problem solving patterns: A review of literature. Int. Edu.J, 187-203.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i10.6317
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.