An Analysis of Question Elements Made by Indonesian Teachers of Leading Schools in Pidie District

Cut Nadia Sahira, Teuku Alamsyah, Ramli Ramli

Abstract


This study aims to elucidate the difficulty level of test items, the discriminative efficacy of these items, and the usefulness of distractors in assessments developed by Indonesian language educators at the Pidie District School of Movers. This study utilizes a quantitative methodology characterized by a descriptive research design. The study population comprises Sekolah Penggerak in Pidie Regency, namely SMP Negeri 1 Muara Tiga and SMP Sukma Bangsa Pidie, the Indonesian language exam items developed by the teachers of Sekolah Penggerak in Pidie Regency, and the students' response sheets. The referenced test items encompass all questions formulated by Indonesian language educators for grades VII, VIII, and IX for the 2023/2024 academic year, utilized in the End-of-Semester Assessment (PAS). The questions for each grade are identical, comprising 30 items and totaling 318 answer pages. The research sample comprises teacher-generated questions from SMP Negeri 1 Muara Tiga, amounting to 30 questions per grade level and 90 student response sheets. The sample was determined using a purposive sampling technique. Data acquisition through documentation methodologies. This study uses the Kuder Richardson-20 (KR-20) formula for data analysis by assessing difficulty level, and discriminative capacity, and evaluating the efficacy of distractors. The research findings reveal that among the seventh-grade questions, 21 items (70%) are classified as having moderate difficulty, 29 items (97%) have acceptable distractor effectiveness, although no items exhibit strong discrimination power. Among the eighth-grade questions, 18 items (60%) are classified as moderately difficult, 9 items (30%) exhibit strong discrimination power, and 26 items (88%) demonstrate acceptable distractor efficacy. Among the ninth-grade questions, 22 items (73%) are classified as moderately difficult, 9 things (30%) exhibit strong discrimination power, and 25 items (85%) have acceptable distractor efficacy. The questions for grade VII require revision or replacement. The questions for grades VIII and IX already satisfy the criteria for quality questions regarding difficulty level, discriminative ability, and the efficacy of distractors.

Keywords


An Analysis of Question Elements; Teachers Made question; Leading School

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alamsyah, Teuku, Ridwan Ibrahim, and Muhammad Idham. 2022. Analisis Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) Guru Bahasa Indonesia Peserta Didik Profesi Guru (PPG) dalam Jabatan. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. 16.2 p. 70-81.

Anas, S. 2019. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi ketiga. In MoDulus: Media Komunikasi Dunia Ilmu Sipil. Vol. 1, No. 1.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2015. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Bahri, S. 2022. Pemulihan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Melalui Kurikulum Prototipe. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. Vol. 12(3). p.204-215.

Earl, L. M. 2012. Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.

Nugraheny, Devita Cahyani, et al. 2023. Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. EUREKA: Journal of Educational Research and Practice. Vol.1: 1-11.

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2001. Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta: BPFFE.

Qomariyah, Nurul, and Muliatul Maghfiroh. 2022. Transisi kurikulum 2013 menjadi Kurikulum Merdeka: peran dan tantangan dalam lembaga pendidikan. Gunung Djati Conference Series. Vol.10.

Sinaga, Dameria. 2014. Statistik Dasar. Jakarta Timur: UKI Press.

Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukardi. 2008. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sukiman. 2012. Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani.

Tang, Tang, Valentina Vezzani, and Vikki Eriksson. 2020. Developing critical thinking, collective creativity skills and problem solving through playful design jams. Thinking Skills and Creativity.

Tiwery, Badseba. 2021. Kekuatan dan Kelemahan Metode Pembelajaran Dalam Penerapan Pembelajaran HOTS: Higher Order Thinking Skills. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i11.6216

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.