Typology of Teacher Questions Participants in Teacher Professional Education in Learning (Pragmatic Study)

Sudjalil Sudjalil, Gigit Mujianto, Nuria Reny Hariyati, Moh. Jathy Anugrasandi

Abstract


Questions are a very important element of one of the skill aspects in the teaching and learning process. Types of questions that are well structured can be used to determine the success of achieving learning objectives. For this reason, this research aims to describe the types and functions of participant teachers' questions. This study used descriptive qualitative method. The approach used is pragmatic. The data source comes from 37 videos of teacher learning practices. Data was collected through recording, note-taking and literature study. Data analysis uses the flow model of analysis by A. Michael Huberman. Based on data analysis, it was concluded: 1. The teacher's questions were of the assertive, directive, commissive and expressive types. Assertive type teacher questions are spoken by the teacher with the aim of finding out students' understanding of the lesson material and confirming students' attendance. Types of directive questions include: a) imperative b) request, c) recommendation, d) order, e) recommendation, f) request, g) ask, h) request, and i) offer. Teacher questions of the commissive type include: agreement, commissive offer, and commissive suggestion or impression-message. Expressive type teacher questions are questions that involve expressions of happiness, liking, excitement, or good. 2. Teacher questions function competitively, convivially and collaboratively. Competitive functions include: orders, requests, recommendations, orders, and questions. Convivial functions include: bargaining, praising, and agreeing. Collaborative functions include: confirmation or statement of presence, and reminding. The competitive function tends to be of the directive type. Convivial functions are directive and commissive types. Meanwhile, the collaborative function is of the assertive type.


Keywords


Typology; Teacher Questions; Pragmatic Studies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, dkk. 2017. Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen Revisi Taksonomi Bloom. Diterjemahkan oleh Agung Prihantoro. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Apriastuti, Ni Nyoman Ayu Ari. 2017. Bentuk, Fungsi dan Jenis Tindak Tutur dalam Komunikasi Siswa di Kelas IX Unggulan SMP PGRI 3 Denpasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. Vol. 1 No.1 2017, 38-47.

Asril, Zainal. 2013. Micro Teaching disertai dengan Pengalaman Lapangan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Baan, Anastasia. 2023. Pengantar Memahami Wacana Pragmatik. Batu: Cakrawala Indonesia.

Denzin, Norman K. Dan Yvonna S. Lincoln. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publication.

Ibrahim, Abd. Syukur. 1993. Kajian Tindak Tutur. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Kreidler, 1998. Introducing English Semantics. New York: Routledge.

Leech, G. 1993. Prinsip-prinsip pragmatik. Jakarta: UI Press.

Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. Principles of Pragmatict. London and New York: Routledge Taylor Francis Group

Lindawati. 2012. Fungsi Tutur Kalimat Tanya Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Litera Vol. 12 No. 2

Marni, Silvia. 2021. Buku Ajar Pragmatik (Kajian Teori dan Praktik). Purbalingga: Eureka Media Aksara.

Rofi’udin. 1994. Sistem Pertanyaan dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pascasarjana IKIP Malang.

Salma, Shaflaini, dkk. 2021. Tindak Tutur Asertif dalam Indonesia Lawyers Club. Nuances of Indonesian languages, Vol. 2 (No. 2) 2021, 91-99.

Sanjaya, Wina. 2005. Pembelajaran dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Sardiman, A. M. 2010. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT RajaGraFindo Persada.

Sugiyono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabet.

Supriyadi. 2011. Strategi Belajar dan Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Cakrawala Ilmu.

Supriyadi, dkk. 2017. Analisis Pertanyaan Guru dalam Pembelajaran di SMA Negeri 2 Kerinci Kanan Kabupaten Siak. Jurnal Geram (Gerakan Aktivis Menulis), Vol. 5 No. 2, Desember 2017, 7-15.

Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i7.5964

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.