Typology of Questions Posed by Teacher: A Pragmatic Analysis

Sudjalil Sudjalil, Gigit Mujianto, Nuria Reny Hariyati, Moh. Jathy Anugrasandi

Abstract


Questions constitute a crucial element within the realm of teaching and learning skills. Well-structured question types serve as effective tools to assess the achievement of learning objectives. This study aims to describe the types and functions of questions posed by teacher participants in the 2023 Professional Teacher Education within the context of Indonesian language instruction. Employing a qualitative descriptive method, the research utilizes a pragmatic approach. Data sources consist of 37 video recordings of teachers' instructional practices, gathered through recording, note-taking, and literature review. Data analysis is conducted using A. Michael Huberman's flow model of analysis. Based on the data analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. Teacher participants in the 2023 Professional Teacher Education exhibit assertive, directive, commissive, and expressive question types. Assertive questions are employed by teachers to gauge students' comprehension of the lesson content and confirm attendance. Directive question types include: a) imperative, b) request, c) recommendation, d) command, e) recommendation, f) request, g) inquiry, h) solicitation, and i) offering. Commissive questions encompass agreements, commissive offers, and commissive suggestions or impressions. Expressive questions involve expressions of joy, liking, excitement, or approval. 2. Questions posed by teacher participants in the 2023 Professional Teacher Education serve competitive, convivial, and collaborative functions. Competitive functions include: orders, requests, recommendations, commands, and inquiries. Convivial functions encompass: offering, praising, and agreeing. Collaborative functions include: confirmation or attendance statements and reminders. Competitive functions tend to be directive in nature, convivial functions are both directive and commissive, while collaborative functions lean towards assertive types.


Keywords


Typology; Teacher Questions; Pragmatic Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, dkk. 2017. Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen Revisi Taksonomi Bloom. Diterjemahkan oleh Agung Prihantoro. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Apriastuti, Ni Nyoman Ayu Ari. 2017. Bentuk, Fungsi dan Jenis Tindak Tutur dalam Komunikasi Siswa di Kelas IX Unggulan SMP PGRI 3 Denpasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. Vol. 1 No.1 2017, 38-47.

Asril, Zainal. 2013. Micro Teaching disertai dengan Pengalaman Lapangan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Baan, Anastasia. 2023. Pengantar Memahami Wacana Pragmatik. Batu: Cakrawala Indonesia.

Denzin, Norman K. Dan Yvonna S. Lincoln. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publication.

Ibrahim, Abd. Syukur. 1993. Kajian Tindak Tutur. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Kreidler, 1998. Introducing English Semantics. New York: Routledge.

Leech, G. 1993. Prinsip-prinsip pragmatik. Jakarta: UI Press.

Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. Principles of Pragmatict. London and New York: Routledge Taylor Francis Group.

Lindawati. 2012. Fungsi Tutur Kalimat Tanya Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Litera Vol. 12 No. 2.

Marni, Silvia. 2021. Buku Ajar Pragmatik (Kajian Teori dan Praktik). Purbalingga: Eureka Media Aksara.

Rofi’udin. 1994. Sistem Pertanyaan dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pascasarjana IKIP Malang.

Salma, Shaflaini, dkk. 2021. Tindak Tutur Asertif dalam Indonesia Lawyers Club. Nuances of Indonesian languages, Vol. 2 (No. 2) 2021, 91-99.

Sanjaya, Wina. 2005. Pembelajaran dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Sardiman, A. M. 2010. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT RajaGraFindo Persada.

Sugiyono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabet.

Supriyadi. 2011. Strategi Belajar dan Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Cakrawala Ilmu.

Supriyadi, dkk. 2017. Analisis Pertanyaan Guru dalam Pembelajaran di SMA Negeri 2 Kerinci Kanan Kabupaten Siak. Jurnal Geram (Gerakan Aktivis Menulis), Vol. 5 No. 2, Desember 2017, 7-15.

Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i7.5959

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.