Rhetoric Analysis Tolerance and Intolerance Posts in Social Media

Antar Venus, Andrio Pratama, Dadang Sugiana, Firdaus Noor

Abstract


The research’s title is Rhetoric Analysis of tolerance and intolerance posts in social media. This research focuses on analysing some tolerance and intolerance posts in so many social media platform from Indonesians.The research aims were to analysis tolerance and intolerance posts in social media with rhetoric approach by Aristotle. The methodology used in this research is qualitative with qualitative with descriptive study. Data of the research were collected with text analysis and study of documentation.The results of the research are explained that: from ethos, mostly, have ethos’s aspect which are intelligence, character, and goodwill. Ethos’s aspect from this research mostly dominated by goodwill. Pathos from posts have some emotion such as symphaty, emphaty, sad, dissapoint, shamelessness, unconfidence, fear, anger and hatred. Logos or logic, there are a lot of logical fallacy in the posts such as irrelevant conclusion, argument ad baculum, argumen ad hominem, argumentum ad misericordiam, argumentum ad populum, argumentum ad verecundiam, false cause, amphiboly, and division.


Keywords


Rhetoric; Tolerance; Teleconferencing; Intolerance; Descriptive; Qualitative

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakhtiar, Amsal. (2007). Filsafat Agama:Wisata Pemikiran dan Kepercayaan Manusia.Jakarta:PT.Rajagrafindo Persada.

Creswell,J.W.(2014).Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset. Yogjakarta:

Pustaka Pelajar.

Husaini,Adian.(2013).Filsafat Ilmu:Perspektif Barat dan Islam. Jakarta:Gema Insani.

Luhukay, Marsefio S. (2007). Presiden SBY dan Politik Pencitraan: Analisis Teks Pidato Presiden SBY dengan Pendekatan Retorika Aristoteles [Jurnal Ilmiah]. Surabaya(ID): Universitas Airlangga Surabaya.

Maran,Rafael Raga (2007).Pengantar Logika.. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.

Moleong, L. J. (2000). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.Bandung:PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.

Munti, Ratna Batara. 2005. Demokrasi Keintiman: Seksualitas di Era Global. Yogyakarta: LkiS Yogyakarta.

Nurdin, Ali. (2006).Quranic Society. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Rahma,Talitha Nindia.(2016).Strategi Pesan Ridwan Kamil dalam Twitter [Skripsi]. Bandung (ID): Universitas Padjadjaran.

Rakhmat,Jalaluddin.(2014).Retorika Modern Pendekatan Praktis.Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

_________________. 2014. Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rebello, Joseph T. 2008. (Why) Do Empty Signifiers Matter to Political Economy? Hegemony Non-Commodity Money and Part One of Capital,University of Massachusetts.Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics.

Sidharta, B. Arief (2008). Pengantar Logika – Sebuah Langkah Pertama Pengenalan Medan Telaah.Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Sumaryono, E.(2009). Dasar-dasar Logika. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo. Sugiyono. 2012. Metode penelitian kuantitatif,kualitatif,dan R&D.Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sutopo H.B.(2002).Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: NS Press.

Wan, Ching. dkk. (2010). Intersubjective Consensus and The Maintenance of Normative Shared Reality.University of Minnesota.

West, Richard.(2008).Pengantar Teori Komunikasi:Teori dan Aplikasi.Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Widyawardani, Yusri Ika. 2016. Rhetorical Analysis of Donald Trump’s Presidential Candidacy Announcement Speech [Thesis].Yogyakarata (ID): Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarata.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.