Differences in the Level of Self-Esteem in Science Class and Social Class Students of SMA Negeri 1 Taman Sidoarjo (in Terms of Gender)
Abstract
This research aims to test methodologically and empirically whether or not there are differences in the level of self-esteem in science class and social class students in term of gender. The research variables consist of: (a) the level of self-esteem, (b) class status, and (c) gender measured using a modified Likert scale and using a level of self-esteem scale. This research is a type of quantitative research. The population was teenagers who attended SMANegeri1 TamanSidoarjo and aged between 15-17 years. The research sampling obtained 80 samples including 40 samples from superior class consisting of 20 males and 20 females and the other 40 samples from social class consisting of 20 males and 20 females. Data analysis of the researchapplies the two-way ANOVA technique. ANOVA test, using computer program assistance (SPSS 17.0 for windows), was used to test two or more variables and to find out whether or not the two variances are the same.
After conducting the difference test using the two-way ANOVA technique with the help of SPSS 17.0 for windows, the basis for decision making is if the significance value is p> 0.05 then Ho is accepted and vice versa if the significance value is p <0.05 then Ho is rejected. The difference test results show that science class and social class students in term of gender.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Azwar, S. (2008). Pengukuran Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Berlin, J. E. (2009). It' s all a matter of perspective: student perceptions on the impact of being labeled gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 31.4 217+.Gale Arts, Humanities and Education Standard Package.
Branden, N. (1999). Kiat Jitu Meningkatkan Self Esteem. Jakarta: Pustaka Delapratasa.
Burvalogo, I.S. (2004). Hubungan antara Persepsi Tentang Attachment dengan Self Esteem Remaja Panti Asuhan Muhamadiyah. Maret 2004 vol.13, No.1. 29-49.
Copersmith. (1967). The Antecndents Of Self-Esteem. San Fransisco: Freeman and Company.
Desvi Yanti. (2005). "Reading self-esteem of historically low achieving students." Journal of Instructional Psychology 37.2 (2010): 184+. Gale Arts, Humanities and Education Standard Package.
Hadi, S. (2001). Metodologi Research Jilid4. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI.
Hanna, L.S. (2003). Erson to Person: Possitive Reliationship, and Culture. Massachusetts. Allyn and Bacon, Irc.
Hoffman, L. & Pais, S. (1988). Developmental Psychology Today (5th. Ed). New York : MCGraw-Hill, Inc.
Katz, L. (1995). StrengthenChildrenSelf (Online), (http://www.kidsource.com/kidsource/content2/StrengthenChildrenSelf.html, Accessed on Desember 28th, 2010)
Lorsen, R.J., & Buss, D.M. (2002). Personality Psychologi: Domain of Knowledge about Human Nature-NewYork: MC Graw-Hill.
Moss, S. (2003). Human Communication Principles and Context, (19thed.). ney York: Mc Graw-Hill.
Perkins. (2000). Menelusuri Kecemasan Pada Remaja,(Online), ((http://abihafiz.wordpress.com/2008/05/17/menelususri-kecemasan-pada-remaja/, Accessed on Desember 28th, 2010).
Reysen S, B. N. R.. (2008). Fanship and Fandom: comparisons between sport and non-sport fans. J. Sports Behav., vol. 33, no. 22, pp. 176–193.
Santrock, J. (2013). Adolescence. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i2.578
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.