The Issue of Execution Process in Civil Procedure Law in Indonesia
Abstract
That a judicial process is a way to resolve issues that arise in society. A good judicial process will promote the creation of justice in society. However, the fact is that not all judicial processes can be carried out to create justice in society, such as when a court decision cannot be enforced or executed, then the judicial process is considered incapable of creating a sense of justice for the community. This study will discuss the issues of execution process in civil procedural law in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical. The research concludes that successful execution terminates the series of civil case resolutions. However, obstacles that occur are technical obstacles such as direction of the crowd at the execution site, and substantive obstacles in the decision, namely the decision does not clearly detail the object and procedure of execution.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A, R. R. (2000). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Raja Grafindo.
Adityo Wahyu Wikanto, Syafrudin Yudowibowo, H. (2014). Eksekusi Riil Dalam Perkara Perdata Tentang Pengosongan Tanah dan Bangunan Rumah. Verstek, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v2i2.38850.
Budi, S. (2017). Permohonan Eksekusi Kepada Pengadilan Negeri Berkaitan Dengan Perjanjian Fidusia Terhadap Jaminan Yang Digelapkan. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 3(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v3i1.15.
Djais, M. (2000). Pikiran Dasar Hukum Eksekusi. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
Githa Bianti. (2023). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Yang Berpotensi Menghambat Kegiatan Investasi Asing Di Indonesia. Jurnal Carepindo, 5(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.5.1.64-78.
M. Yahya Harahap. (1988). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Gramedia.
M. Yahya Harahap. (2007). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Sinar Grafika.
Manan, A. (2013). Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim Dalam Praktek Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 2(2), 189–202.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram Universty Press.
R Subekti. (2001). Hukum Perjanjian (19th ed.). Intermasa.
Riduan, S. (2015). Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Umum. Pustaka Kartini.
RM Anton Suyatno. (2014). Perlawanan Dalam Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Berdasarkan Titel Eksekutorial. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.3.1.2014.1-10.
Sri Hartini, Setiati Widihastuti, I. N. (2017). Eksekusi putusan hakim dalam sengketa perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman. Jurnal Civics, 14(2), 130–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22219/jch.v2i1.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2006). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty.
Suteki, & Taufani, G. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori, dan Praktik) (3 (ed.); p. 176). Rajawali Pers.
Tan Henny Tanuwidjaya. (2016). Parate Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Kontra Fiat Pengadilan. Refleksi Hukum, 10(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2016.v10.i1.p99-109.
Wiyono, R. (2014). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Sinar Grafika.
Wulan, S. R. (2013). Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek. Mandar Maju.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i5.5772
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.